IFRA ranks 1st and GII 3rd of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs IFRA
IFRA −0.10pt a year
0.40%0.30%
IFRA 9.6×the volume
41.6K398K
IFRA +2.3pt
+9.9%+12.2%
GII vs IFRA Performance
+60.0%+77.5%
- GII 0.40%
- IFRA 0.30%, better
- GII $962M
- IFRA $4.07B
- GII +11.2%
- IFRA +12.7%, better
- GII 2.69%, better
- IFRA 1.74%
- GII 89
- IFRA 165
- GII 41.6K sh
- IFRA 398K sh, better
- GII $74.56
- IFRA $58.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | IFRA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A83 | |
| Risk | A72Higher | B55 |
| Tradability | A72 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A82Higher |
| Durability | A85Higher | A81 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and IFRA are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
IFRAA
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
IFRA Most infrastructure funds pick a side: the companies that build the stuff, or the ones that own it. IFRA holds both, stays entirely American, and charges well under the category's typical fee.
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
IFRA The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. companies with infrastructure exposure, balancing infrastructure enablers and infrastructure asset owners.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs IFRA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs IFRA Cost
Overpaying GII vs IFRA
$1,941
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
IFRA 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | IFRA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $545 | $178 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $2,113 | $680 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $6,149 | $1,941 |
- 0.40%GII
- 0.30%IFRA, cheaper
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
IFRA cheapest of 33 funds
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs IFRA Dividends
- GII 2.69%, better
- IFRA 1.74%
- GII $2.02
- IFRA $1.02
- GII $0.78
- IFRA $0.26
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- IFRA Sep 15, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- IFRA Sep 18, 2026
- GII Twice a year
- IFRA Quarterly
Distribution history
GII vs IFRA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GII
- IFRA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%, betterIFRA 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17, betterIFRA 0.92
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%IFRA −19.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56IFRA 0.96
GII and IFRA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


