SCYB ranks 2nd and BKHY 11th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
BKHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.19pt a year
0.22%0.03%
SCYB 38.0×the volume
29.1K1.1M
BKHY +0.1pt
+7.8%+7.7%
BKHY vs SCYB Performance
+1.8%+2.0%
- BKHY 0.22%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- BKHY $156M
- SCYB $2.8B
- BKHY +1.8%
- SCYB +2.0%, better
- BKHY 8.19%, better
- SCYB 7.82%
- BKHY 1589
- SCYB 1844
- BKHY 29.1K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- BKHY $45.79
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BKHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C54 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | A86 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B56 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. BKHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BKHYA
SCYBA
In short
BKHY Junk bonds, whole hog. BKHY mirrors the Bloomberg index that defines the US high yield market, roughly 1,600 issues deep, for 0.22% a year. A broad, low-fee tracker that happens to be one of the smaller names on the shelf.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
BKHY The fund uses a rules-based, systematic strategy to track a high-yield bond index. It normally invests at least 80% of its assets in bonds from that index, while similar derivatives may also be used.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BKHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BKHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying BKHY vs SCYB
$3,920
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BKHY 0.22%
$4,558
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BKHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $55 | $346 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $216 | $1,345 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $638 | $3,920 |
- 0.22%BKHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
BKHY 15th cheapest of 84 funds
BKHY vs SCYB Dividends
- BKHY 8.19%, better
- SCYB 7.82%
- BKHY $3.73
- SCYB $1.96
- BKHY $0.27
- SCYB $0.16
- BKHY Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- BKHY Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- BKHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
BKHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BKHY 4.7%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BKHY 0.84, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- BKHY −15.9%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BKHY 0.64SCYB 0.28
BKHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
