EELV ranks 2nd and BLES 5th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
BLES vs EELV
EELV −0.31pt a year
0.60%0.29%
EELV 5.3×the volume
10.5K56K
BLES +0.6pt
+7.3%+6.7%
BLES vs EELV Performance
+42.4%+38.0%
- BLES 0.60%
- EELV 0.29%, better
- BLES $167M
- EELV $386M
- BLES +14.9%, better
- EELV +8.5%
- BLES 1.86%
- EELV 4.40%, better
- BLES 416
- EELV 208
- BLES 10.5K sh
- EELV 56K sh, better
- BLES $48.38
- EELV $27.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BLES | EELV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A78Higher |
| Mission | B65 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | B68 |
| Tradability | D38 | C40Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | B69 |
| Durability | D38 | A70Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. BLES and EELV are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BLESC
EELVB
In short
BLES One of the two funds that launched Inspire's lineup in 2017: roughly 400 large caps from the US, developed markets and emerging markets, screened against biblical values and held in equal slices.
EELV EELV hunts the calm corners of emerging markets: roughly 200 of the least volatile stocks in a broad EM universe, chosen by rule rather than by a manager's hunch. Same asset class, deliberately lower-drama construction.
Stated mandate
BLES The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index.
EELV The fund provides exposure to emerging-market stocks selected for low volatility by tracking the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BLES vs EELV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BLES vs EELV Cost
Overpaying BLES vs EELV
$5,865
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BLES 0.60%
$11,817
EELV 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BLES | EELV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $527 | $549 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,044 | $2,072 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $5,952 | $5,865 |
- 0.60%BLES
- 0.29%EELV, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
EELV 2nd cheapest of 10 funds
BLES 7th cheapest of 10 funds
BLES vs EELV Dividends
- BLES 1.86%
- EELV 4.40%, better
- BLES $0.89
- EELV $1.22
- BLES $0.18
- EELV $0.43
- BLES Sep 25, 2026
- EELV Sep 21, 2026
- BLES Oct 1, 2026
- EELV Sep 25, 2026
- BLES Quarterly
- EELV Quarterly
Distribution history
BLES vs EELV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BLES
- EELV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BLES 12.3%EELV 9.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BLES 1.10, betterEELV 0.92
- Worst fall
- BLES −26.6%EELV −19.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BLES 0.88EELV 0.60
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.