EELV ranks 2nd and PXH 4th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
EELV vs PXH
EELV −0.18pt a year
0.29%0.47%
PXH 4.0×the volume
56K223K
PXH +1.8pt
+6.5%+8.3%
EELV vs PXH Performance
+38.0%+59.1%
- EELV 0.29%, better
- PXH 0.47%
- EELV $386M
- PXH $1.94B
- EELV +8.5%
- PXH +13.1%, better
- EELV 4.40%, better
- PXH 4.13%
- EELV 208
- PXH 365
- EELV 56K sh
- PXH 223K sh, better
- EELV $27.86
- PXH $28.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EELV | PXH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | C44 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B68Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | C40 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | B69Higher | B55 |
| Durability | A70 | A76Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. EELV and PXH are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EELVB
PXHB
In short
EELV EELV hunts the calm corners of emerging markets: roughly 200 of the least volatile stocks in a broad EM universe, chosen by rule rather than by a manager's hunch. Same asset class, deliberately lower-drama construction.
PXH Most emerging-markets funds size positions by share price. PXH sizes them by economic footprint (sales, cash flow, dividends, book value), the fundamental-indexing approach it has run since 2007. A value-tilted EM portfolio built from the accounting statements up.
Stated mandate
EELV The fund provides exposure to emerging-market stocks selected for low volatility by tracking the S&P BMI Emerging Markets Low Volatility Index.
PXH The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the RAFI strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EELV vs PXH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EELV vs PXH Cost
Overpaying PXH vs EELV
$3,466
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EELV 0.29%
$5,952
PXH 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EELV | PXH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $847 | $320 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $3,261 | $1,217 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $9,418 | $3,466 |
- 0.29%EELV, cheaper
- 0.47%PXH
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
EELV 2nd cheapest of 10 funds
PXH 6th cheapest of 10 funds
EELV vs PXH Dividends
- EELV 4.40%, better
- PXH 4.13%
- EELV $1.22
- PXH $1.16
- EELV $0.43
- PXH $0.32
- EELV Sep 21, 2026
- PXH Sep 21, 2026
- EELV Sep 25, 2026
- PXH Sep 25, 2026
- EELV Quarterly
- PXH Quarterly
Distribution history
EELV vs PXH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EELV
- PXH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EELV 9.2%, betterPXH 11.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- EELV 0.92PXH 1.49, better
- Worst fall
- EELV −19.0%, betterPXH −29.6%
- Market sensitivity
- EELV 0.60PXH 0.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.