FNDE ranks 3rd and BLES 5th of 10 funds in the Emerging Markets Factor Index Category.
BLES vs FNDE
FNDE −0.21pt a year
0.60%0.39%
FNDE 145.6×the volume
10.5K1.53M
FNDE +2.3pt
+7.3%+9.6%
BLES vs FNDE Performance
+42.4%+58.4%
- BLES 0.60%
- FNDE 0.39%, better
- BLES $167M
- FNDE $9.97B
- BLES +14.9%, better
- FNDE +14.4%
- BLES 1.86%
- FNDE 3.66%, better
- BLES 416
- FNDE 370
- BLES 10.5K sh
- FNDE 1.53M sh, better
- BLES $48.38
- FNDE $40.60
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BLES | FNDE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | B62Higher |
| Mission | B65 | A96Higher |
| Risk | A79Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | D38 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C54 |
| Durability | D38 | A79Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
Same Category. BLES and FNDE are both graded against the same 10 Emerging Markets Factor Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BLESC
FNDEB
In short
BLES One of the two funds that launched Inspire's lineup in 2017: roughly 400 large caps from the US, developed markets and emerging markets, screened against biblical values and held in equal slices.
FNDE Most emerging-markets funds size a position by its market price. FNDE sizes it by the business behind it, weighting large EM companies on fundamental measures instead of market cap. Schwab has run this value-leaning version since 2013.
Stated mandate
BLES The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Inspire Global Hope Large Cap Equal Weight Index.
FNDE The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of large companies in emerging-market countries selected and weighted according to fundamental size measures.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BLES vs FNDE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BLES vs FNDE Cost
Overpaying BLES vs FNDE
$3,919
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BLES 0.60%
$11,817
FNDE 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BLES | FNDE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $705 | $371 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,725 | $1,391 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $7,898 | $3,919 |
- 0.60%BLES
- 0.39%FNDE, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Factor Index funds
- Median 0.44%
FNDE 4th cheapest of 10 funds
BLES 7th cheapest of 10 funds
BLES vs FNDE Dividends
- BLES 1.86%
- FNDE 3.66%, better
- BLES $0.89
- FNDE $1.49
- BLES $0.18
- FNDE $0.19
- BLES Sep 25, 2026
- FNDE Jun 24, 2026
- BLES Oct 1, 2026
- FNDE Jun 29, 2026
- BLES Quarterly
- FNDE Twice a year
Distribution history
BLES vs FNDE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BLES
- FNDE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BLES 12.3%FNDE 11.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BLES 1.10FNDE 1.49, better
- Worst fall
- BLES −26.6%, betterFNDE −29.4%
- Market sensitivity
- BLES 0.88FNDE 0.80
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.29%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.