VONV ranks 1st and BLGR 73rd of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
BLGR vs VONV
VONV −0.17pt a year
0.23%0.06%
VONV 27.7×the volume
27.9K774K
BLGR vs VONV Performance
+5.7%+28.5%
- BLGR 0.23%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- BLGR $306M
- VONV $23.3B
- BLGR +5.7%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- BLGR 0.27%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- BLGR 5
- VONV 873
- BLGR 27.9K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- BLGR $32.08
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BLGR | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B65 | A100Higher |
| Risk | F8 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | D29 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | F21 | C49Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. BLGR and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BLGRC
VONVA
In short
BLGR Most multifactor ETFs lean value or dividends. BLGR goes the other way: at least 80% in large US growth companies, picked by a proprietary growth, momentum and value model, at 0.23% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
BLGR The fund seeks capital growth and is designed to invest at least 80% of its assets in large, domestic growth companies.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BLGR vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BLGR vs VONV Cost
Overpaying BLGR vs VONV
$3,489
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BLGR 0.23%
$4,759
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BLGR | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $419 | $110 | $309 |
| 20 | $1,630 | $432 | $1,198 |
| 30 | $4,759 | $1,270 | $3,489 |
- 0.23%BLGR
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
BLGR 34th cheapest of 99 funds
BLGR vs VONV Dividends
- BLGR 0.27%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- BLGR $0.08
- VONV $1.74
- BLGR $0.03
- VONV $0.42
- BLGR Sep 28, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- BLGR Sep 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- BLGR Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
BLGR vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BLGR 16.5%VONV 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- BLGR 0.66VONV 1.43
- Worst fall
- BLGR −14.1%VONV −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BLGR 1.32VONV 0.85
BLGR and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

