SCHZ ranks 2nd and BLST 46th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
BLST vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.19pt a year
0.22%0.03%
SCHZ 126.1×the volume
18.8K2.37M
BLST vs SCHZ Performance
+1.0%−0.2%
- BLST 0.22%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- BLST $172M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- BLST +1.0%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- BLST 3.96%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- BLST 4
- SCHZ 12610
- BLST 18.8K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- BLST $24.54
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BLST | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B69 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B64Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | C48 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | F22 | A78Higher |
| Durability | C40 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. BLST and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BLSTB
SCHZA
In short
BLST One ticket, an actively managed basket of short-duration bond ETFs: Treasuries, corporates, TIPS and securitized debt, with a four-year average maturity ceiling written into the prospectus. Rate risk kept on a short leash.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
BLST The Fund seeks total return and income. It is actively managed and obtains at least 80% bond exposure, primarily through underlying funds holding short-duration debt securities.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BLST vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BLST vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying BLST vs SCHZ
$3,920
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BLST 0.22%
$4,558
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BLST | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $55 | $346 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $216 | $1,345 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $638 | $3,920 |
- 0.22%BLST
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
BLST 35th cheapest of 114 funds
BLST vs SCHZ Dividends
- BLST 3.96%
- SCHZ 4.27%, better
- BLST $0.97
- SCHZ $0.96
- BLST $0.10
- SCHZ $0.08
- BLST Oct 28, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- BLST Oct 30, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- BLST Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
BLST vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BLST 2.5%SCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BLST −0.66SCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- BLST −2.3%SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BLST 0.05SCHZ 0.99
BLST and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
