Skip to content

BMAY vs XTR

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BMAYCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

XTR −0.54pt a year

BMAY0.79%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

BMAY 12.3×the volume

BMAY20.1KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

XTR +0.7pt

BMAY+8.2%XTR+8.9%

BMAY vs XTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+48.3%BMAY+53.3%XTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. BMAY +48.3%. XTR +53.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BMAY 0.79%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
BMAY $180M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
BMAY +9.4%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
BMAY No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
BMAY 3
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
BMAY 20.1K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
BMAY $48.33
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BMAY: Cost 40, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings not scored, Durability 73. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for BMAY, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBMAYXTR
Cost30% weightC40A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB68HigherF18
Tradability15% weightC52HigherF13
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightA73HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BMAY and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

BMAY ranks 37th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 37CBJUNInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  2. Rank 37CBMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  3. Rank 40CBNOVInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 50
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BMAYCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

BMAY Innovator's May-dated buffer fund: it shadows the S&P 500 up to a preset cap and absorbs the first 9% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each May 1. The shallow buffer is what buys the higher cap.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

BMAY The fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BMAY The contract is spelled out up front: first 9% of S&P 500 losses absorbed, gains capped, over a defined period ending April 30. You know the shape of the outcome before you own it.
  • 0.79% a year, right at the median for its buffer cohort. Options-built defense costs more than plain index beta, but you aren't paying above the going rate for it.
  • Live since 2020, with several full outcome periods behind it rather than a launch-week track record.
  • Lands in the upper half of a crowded cohort of 50-plus shallow S&P 500 buffer funds.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BMAY The 9% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever protection and upside are left, not the headline terms.
  • Thinly traded next to the S&P 500 giants, so spreads can be wider and limit orders earn their keep.
  • Innovator's laddered sibling BUFB spreads across start months and carries a 0.10% expense ratio, a cheaper route for anyone who doesn't want a single calendar slot.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full BMAY profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

BMAY vs XTR Holdings

As of

How BMAY and XTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BMAY and 0.0% of XTR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors99.6%

Sector

Sector weights in BMAY and XTR, widest gap first
SectorMore in BMAYMore in XTR
TechnologyXTR +0.4 points
Health CareBMAY +0.2 points
IndustrialsBMAY +0.1 points
FinancialsBMAY +0.1 points
Consumer StaplesBMAY +0.1 points
Real EstateSame weight
CommunicationXTR +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BMAY and XTR, widest gap first
CountryMore in BMAYMore in XTR
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BMAY102.4%
  • XTR38.9%

Securities held

  • BMAY3
  • XTR505

Asset class

BMAY
Equity
XTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BMAY3
  • In both0
  • Only in XTR505

Only in BMAY

3 securities, 100% of BMAY by weight

  • Spy 04/30/2027 7.2 C99.42%
  • Spy 04/30/2027 718.67 P2.61%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.33%

Only in XTR

505 securities, 99.9% of XTR by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp8.11%
  • Apple Inc7.37%
  • Microsoft Corp5.95%

Weight gaps

BMAY and XTR share no securities.

All 6 BMAY holdings⁠All 503 XTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BMAY vs XTR Cost

Overpaying BMAY vs XTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BMAY 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BMAY 0.79%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BMAY $15,174XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearBMAYXTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BMAY
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

BMAY 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BMAY vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BMAY No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
BMAY None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
BMAY No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
BMAY No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
BMAY No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
BMAY No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

BMAYAll BMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

BMAY vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BMAY
  • XTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BMAY 6.1%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BMAY 1.82, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BMAY −17.7%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BMAY 0.48XTR 0.94

Popular comparisons

  • BMAYCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMAYCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMAYCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.