GOGL ranks 123rd and BMNU 275th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
BMNU vs GOGL
GOGL −1.30pt a year
1.50%0.20%
BMNU 257.5×the volume
4.88M18.9K
BMNU vs GOGL Performance
+12.1%−41.9%
- BMNU 1.50%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- BMNU $278M
- GOGL $4M
- BMNU −94.1%
- GOGL
- BMNU 7
- GOGL 1
- BMNU 4.88M sh, better
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- BMNU $13.22
- GOGL $15.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BMNU | GOGL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F11 | A99Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | F24 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B59Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | D37 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. BMNU and GOGL are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
BMNU vs GOGL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BMNU vs GOGL Cost
Overpaying BMNU vs GOGL
$22,128
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BMNU 1.50%
$26,283
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BMNU | GOGL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,590 | $365 | $2,225 |
| 20 | $9,519 | $1,421 | $8,098 |
| 30 | $26,283 | $4,155 | $22,128 |
- 1.50%BMNU
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
BMNU 271st cheapest of 315 funds
BMNU vs GOGL Dividends
- BMNU None
- GOGL None
Distribution history
BMNU vs GOGL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BMNU 161.4%GOGL
- Return per unit of risk
- BMNU −0.96GOGL
- Worst fall
- BMNU −98.3%GOGL
- Market sensitivity
- BMNU 2.52GOGL −3.37
BMNU and GOGL in the news
First-Year Review
Since year-end the 2x BitMine fund lost half while the stock rose

Popular comparisons
- 1.50% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.50% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.