SCYB ranks 1st and BNDS 69th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
BNDS vs SCYB
SCYB −0.85pt a year
0.88%0.03%
SCYB 40.7×the volume
28K1.14M
BNDS vs SCYB Performance
+1.8%+2.6%
- BNDS 0.88%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- BNDS $86M
- SCYB $2.73B
- BNDS +1.8%
- SCYB +2.6%, better
- BNDS 8.62%, better
- SCYB 7.16%
- BNDS 87
- SCYB 1838
- BNDS 28K sh
- SCYB 1.14M sh, better
- BNDS $47.13
- SCYB $25.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDS | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F2 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A71 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D25 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B57 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | D36 | A99Higher |
| Durability | D36 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. BNDS and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDSD
SCYBA
In short
BNDS Most high yield bond ETFs track an index for pennies. BNDS goes the other way: active picks in undervalued corporate bonds, a preferred stock sleeve, and covered calls written on liquid bond ETFs, paid out monthly, for 0.88%.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
BNDS The Fund seeks to maximize current income while also pursuing opportunities for capital appreciation.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDS vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDS vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying BNDS vs SCYB
$16,067
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDS 0.88%
$16,705
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDS | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,559 | $55 | $1,504 |
| 20 | $5,891 | $216 | $5,675 |
| 30 | $16,705 | $638 | $16,067 |
- 0.88%BNDS
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
BNDS 82nd cheapest of 84 funds
BNDS vs SCYB Dividends
- BNDS 8.62%, better
- SCYB 7.16%
- BNDS $4.08
- SCYB $1.81
- BNDS $0.34
- SCYB $0.16
- BNDS Oct 29, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- BNDS Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- BNDS Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
BNDS vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDS 6.1%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDS 0.04SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- BNDS −7.0%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BNDS 0.31SCYB 0.28
BNDS and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.88% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.88% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
