BNDW ranks 2nd and PYLD 16th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
BNDW vs PYLD
BNDW −0.51pt a year
0.05%0.56%
PYLD 43.6×the volume
117K5.11M
PYLD +3.7pt
+4.9%+8.6%
BNDW vs PYLD Performance
−0.4%+1.6%
- BNDW 0.05%, better
- PYLD 0.56%
- BNDW $1.9B
- PYLD $15.9B
- BNDW −0.4%
- PYLD +1.6%, better
- BNDW 4.36%
- PYLD 6.54%, better
- BNDW 4
- PYLD 2035
- BNDW 117K sh
- PYLD 5.11M sh, better
- BNDW $66.90
- PYLD $25.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BNDW | PYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C43 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B67 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | F20 | B56Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A72 |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. BNDW and PYLD are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BNDWA
PYLDB
In short
BNDW One ticker for the whole investment-grade bond market, home and abroad. Vanguard built BNDW as a wrapper around its own US and international bond funds and prices the package at 0.05% a year.
PYLD PIMCO's go-anywhere credit desk, wrapped in an ETF. No benchmark to hug: the team roams global bond sectors hunting yield and pays out monthly. The fee is a real one, but so is the mandate.
Stated mandate
BNDW The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index and provide broad exposure to the global investment-grade bond market through an ETF-of-ETFs structure.
PYLD The Fund seeks to maximize yield and achieve long-term capital appreciation while using prudent investment management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BNDW vs PYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BNDW vs PYLD Cost
Overpaying PYLD vs BNDW
$10,028
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BNDW 0.05%
$1,060
PYLD 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BNDW | PYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $1,006 | $914 |
| 20 | $360 | $3,855 | $3,495 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $11,088 | $10,028 |
- 0.05%BNDW, cheaper
- 0.56%PYLD
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
BNDW cheapest of 28 funds
PYLD 24th cheapest of 28 funds
BNDW vs PYLD Dividends
- BNDW 4.36%
- PYLD 6.54%, better
- BNDW $2.92
- PYLD $1.68
- BNDW $0.20
- PYLD $0.14
- BNDW Oct 1, 2026
- PYLD Oct 1, 2026
- BNDW Oct 5, 2026
- PYLD Oct 5, 2026
- BNDW Monthly
- PYLD Monthly
Distribution history
BNDW vs PYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BNDW 4.7%, betterPYLD 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- BNDW 0.10PYLD 0.81, better
- Worst fall
- BNDW −16.2%PYLD −4.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BNDW 0.82PYLD 0.81
BNDW and PYLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


