GRNB ranks 2nd and PYLD 16th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
GRNB vs PYLD
GRNB −0.36pt a year
0.20%0.56%
PYLD 149.5×the volume
34.2K5.11M
PYLD +2.8pt
+5.8%+8.6%
GRNB vs PYLD Performance
+0.2%+1.6%
- GRNB 0.20%, better
- PYLD 0.56%
- GRNB $196M
- PYLD $15.9B
- GRNB +0.2%
- PYLD +1.6%, better
- GRNB 4.52%
- PYLD 6.54%, better
- GRNB 475
- PYLD 2035
- GRNB 34.2K sh
- PYLD 5.11M sh, better
- GRNB $23.46
- PYLD $25.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GRNB | PYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A93 | A96Higher |
| Risk | B65 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A100Higher | B56 |
| Durability | C48 | A72Higher |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. GRNB and PYLD are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GRNBA
PYLDB
In short
GRNB Its peer group is stacked with total-bond-market giants. GRNB goes narrow instead: only dollar-denominated green bonds funding environmental projects, issued worldwide by governments, supranationals and companies. A 2017-vintage specialist at 0.20%.
PYLD PIMCO's go-anywhere credit desk, wrapped in an ETF. No benchmark to hug: the team roams global bond sectors hunting yield and pays out monthly. The fee is a real one, but so is the mandate.
Stated mandate
GRNB The fund seeks to track the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index before fees and expenses. The index covers U.S.-dollar-denominated green bonds financing environmentally friendly projects and issued globally by supranational, government, and corporate entities.
PYLD The Fund seeks to maximize yield and achieve long-term capital appreciation while using prudent investment management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GRNB vs PYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GRNB vs PYLD Cost
Overpaying PYLD vs GRNB
$6,933
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GRNB 0.20%
$4,155
PYLD 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GRNB | PYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,006 | $641 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $3,855 | $2,434 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $11,088 | $6,933 |
- 0.20%GRNB, cheaper
- 0.56%PYLD
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
GRNB 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
PYLD 24th cheapest of 28 funds
GRNB vs PYLD Dividends
- GRNB 4.52%
- PYLD 6.54%, better
- GRNB $1.06
- PYLD $1.68
- GRNB $0.09
- PYLD $0.14
- GRNB Oct 1, 2026
- PYLD Oct 1, 2026
- GRNB Oct 6, 2026
- PYLD Oct 5, 2026
- GRNB Monthly
- PYLD Monthly
Distribution history
GRNB vs PYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GRNB 4.4%, betterPYLD 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GRNB 0.30PYLD 0.81, better
- Worst fall
- GRNB −16.4%PYLD −4.5%
- Market sensitivity
- GRNB 0.69PYLD 0.81
GRNB and PYLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

