DFGP ranks 1st and PYLD 16th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
DFGP vs PYLD
DFGP −0.34pt a year
0.22%0.56%
PYLD 12.0×the volume
425K5.11M
DFGP vs PYLD Performance
−0.1%+1.6%
- DFGP 0.22%, better
- PYLD 0.56%
- DFGP $3.79B
- PYLD $15.9B
- DFGP −0.1%
- PYLD +1.6%, better
- DFGP 4.85%
- PYLD 6.54%, better
- DFGP 1619
- PYLD 2035
- DFGP 425K sh
- PYLD 5.11M sh, better
- DFGP $52.60
- PYLD $25.58
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | DFGP | PYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C49 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B65 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | A88Higher | B56 |
| Durability | B61 | A72Higher |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. DFGP and PYLD are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
DFGPA
PYLDB
In short
DFGP Dimensional's global bond playbook in ETF form: roughly 1,300 US and foreign bonds, chosen by rules that chase credit and term premiums, at 0.22% net of a waiver through February 28, 2027.
PYLD PIMCO's go-anywhere credit desk, wrapped in an ETF. No benchmark to hug: the team roams global bond sectors hunting yield and pays out monthly. The fee is a real one, but so is the mandate.
Stated mandate
DFGP The fund seeks its objective through investments in U.S. and foreign fixed-income securities.
PYLD The Fund seeks to maximize yield and achieve long-term capital appreciation while using prudent investment management.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
DFGP vs PYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
DFGP vs PYLD Cost
Overpaying PYLD vs DFGP
$6,530
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
DFGP 0.22%
$4,558
PYLD 0.56%
$11,088
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | DFGP | PYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $401 | $1,006 | $605 |
| 20 | $1,561 | $3,855 | $2,294 |
| 30 | $4,558 | $11,088 | $6,530 |
- 0.22%DFGP, cheaper
- 0.56%PYLD
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
DFGP 4th cheapest of 28 funds
PYLD 24th cheapest of 28 funds
DFGP vs PYLD Dividends
- DFGP 4.85%
- PYLD 6.54%, better
- DFGP $2.56
- PYLD $1.68
- DFGP $0.25
- PYLD $0.14
- DFGP Oct 20, 2026
- PYLD Oct 1, 2026
- DFGP Oct 22, 2026
- PYLD Oct 5, 2026
- DFGP Irregular
- PYLD Monthly
Distribution history
DFGP vs PYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- DFGP 4.7%PYLD 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- DFGP 0.06PYLD 0.81
- Worst fall
- DFGP −3.9%PYLD −4.5%
- Market sensitivity
- DFGP 0.22PYLD 0.81
DFGP and PYLD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.22% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.22% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.56% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

