Skip to content

BNOV vs SIXJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BNOVCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.05pt a year

BNOV0.79%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BNOV 1.2×the volume

BNOV17.6KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

SIXJ +0.6pt

BNOV+13.9%SIXJ+14.5%

BNOV vs SIXJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+11.1%BNOV+10.7%SIXJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. BNOV +11.1%. SIXJ +10.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
BNOV 0.79%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
BNOV $195M
SIXJ $146M
1Y total return
BNOV +11.1%, better
SIXJ +10.7%
Holdings
BNOV 503
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
BNOV 17.6K sh, better
SIXJ 15.1K sh
NAV per share
BNOV $47.65
SIXJ $36.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BNOV: Cost 40, Risk 34, Mission 84, Tradability 54, Holdings 89, Durability 76. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 72, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for BNOV, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBNOVSIXJ
Cost30% weightC40B68Higher
Mission25% weightA84Not scored
Risk15% weightD34A72Higher
Tradability15% weightC54A72Higher
Holdings10% weightA89HigherC53
Durability5% weightA76HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BNOV and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 2nd and BNOV 40th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 76
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 66
  3. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BJANPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 65
  5. Rank 37CBMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  6. Rank 40CBNOVInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 50
  7. Rank 41CFFEBFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 48

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BNOVCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

BNOV The November rung of Innovator's buffer lineup: it follows the big S&P 500 ETF up to a cap set each November 1 and absorbs that ETF's first 9% of losses, then starts over a year later.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

BNOV The fund seeks to track SPY up to a predetermined cap while buffering investors against the first 9% of losses over the outcome period.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • BNOV The contract is simple: the first 9% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's decline is buffered over the outcome period, with gains capped at a level fixed at the start.
  • Running since its 2019 launch, it resets on a fixed calendar: a fresh buffer and cap every November 1, through the following October 31.
  • The 0.79% expense ratio sits right at the median for shallow-buffer funds built on the same S&P 500 ETF.
  • The defined outcome arrives in a plain 1940 Act ETF wrapper, not a bank-issued structured note.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • BNOV Priced with the pack at 0.79%, but cheaper paths to a buffer exist, including the laddered BUFB at 0.10%.
  • The buffer and cap are engineered for a full outcome period. Buying mid-period means your effective protection and upside differ from the headline terms.
  • It trades thinly next to its peers, and across a crowded field of 50-plus shallow-buffer funds it sits in the lower half on cost, trading and risk.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full BNOV profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

BNOV vs SIXJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BNOV vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying BNOV vs SIXJ

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BNOV 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BNOV 0.79%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BNOV $15,174SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearBNOVSIXJOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BNOV
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

BNOV 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BNOV vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
BNOV None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

BNOVAll BNOV payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BNOV vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BNOV 8.0%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BNOV 1.23SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BNOV −16.3%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BNOV 0.71SIXJ 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • BNOVCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BNOVCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BNOVCvsJANPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsJANPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.