Skip to content

BSEP vs SIXJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BSEPBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.05pt a year

BSEP0.79%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BSEP 3.7×the volume

BSEP56.1KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

BSEP +2.6pt

BSEP+17.5%SIXJ+14.9%

BSEP vs SIXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.2%BSEP+10.5%SIXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BSEP +10.2%. SIXJ +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BSEP 0.79%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
BSEP $459M
SIXJ $149M
1Y total return
BSEP +10.2%
SIXJ +10.5%, better
Yield (12M)
BSEP 0.00%
SIXJ No data
Holdings
BSEP 503
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
BSEP 56.1K sh, better
SIXJ 15.1K sh
NAV per share
BSEP $53.71
SIXJ $37.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BSEP: Cost 40, Risk 40, Mission 97, Tradability 66, Holdings 90, Durability 76. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for BSEP, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBSEPSIXJ
Cost30% weightC40B68Higher
Mission25% weightA97Not scored
Risk15% weightC40B67Higher
Tradability15% weightB66A70Higher
Holdings10% weightA90HigherC53
Durability5% weightA76HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BSEP and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 4th and BSEP 30th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 30CBFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  7. Rank 30BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 54
  8. Rank 32CAUGTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETFScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BSEPBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

BSEP Innovator's September-reset buffer fund: it tracks SPY, absorbs the first 9% of a decline, and trades that cushion for a cap reset every fall. Downside padding with a ceiling, on a schedule you can mark on a calendar.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

BSEP The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting investors against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period. It resets approximately annually.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • BSEP Absorbs the first 9% of an SPY decline over each roughly one-year outcome period, a cushion written into the fund's documents rather than left to a manager's call.
  • The terms are mechanical and public: SPY as the reference, a 9% buffer, a cap set at each September reset, the period running through the end of August.
  • The 0.79% fee lands right at the median for buffer funds, so the defined-outcome wrapper isn't costing a premium versus the pack.
  • Running since 2019, with years of completed reset cycles behind it across both rising and falling markets.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • BSEP Cheaper buffered exposure exists. Innovator's own laddered BUFB charges 0.10% and spreads money across staggered outcome periods instead of one annual window.
  • Trading is thin next to the category's larger funds, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the usual defense.
  • No distributions: the payoff is built around price movement inside the cap and buffer. Buying mid-period also means a different cap and remaining cushion than a fresh start.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full BSEP profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

BSEP vs SIXJ Holdings

How BSEP and SIXJ differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BSEP and 0.0% of SIXJ.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector11 Sectors98.0%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in BSEP and SIXJ, widest gap first
SectorMore in BSEPMore in SIXJ
CommunicationSIXJ +1.1 points
TechnologySIXJ +0.6 points
EnergyBSEP +0.4 points
Health CareBSEP +0.3 points
FinancialsBSEP +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesBSEP +0.3 points
Consumer DiscretionaryBSEP +0.3 points
IndustrialsSIXJ +0.2 points
MaterialsBSEP +0.2 points
UtilitiesBSEP +0.1 points
Real EstateBSEP +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in BSEP and SIXJ, widest gap first
CountryMore in BSEPMore in SIXJ
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • BSEP40.2%
  • SIXJ100.8%

Securities held

  • BSEP503
  • SIXJ2

Asset class

BSEP
Equity
SIXJ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in BSEP503
  • In both0
  • Only in SIXJ2

Only in BSEP

503 securities, 100% of BSEP by weight

  • Apple Inc7.53%
  • NVIDIA Corp7.42%
  • Microsoft Corp5.81%

Only in SIXJ

2 securities, 100% of SIXJ by weight

  • Spy 12/31/2026 5.53 C99.26%
  • Spy 12/31/2026 746.70 P1.26%

Weight gaps

BSEP and SIXJ share no securities.

All BSEP holdings⁠All 5 SIXJ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BSEP vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying BSEP vs SIXJ

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BSEP 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BSEP 0.79%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BSEP $15,174SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearBSEPSIXJOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BSEP
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

BSEP 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BSEP vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BSEP 0.00%
SIXJ No data
Payout (12M)
BSEP None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2019, same scale for both

BSEP1 paymentAll BSEP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2019. Nov 19, 2019 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252019
SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BSEP vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BSEP 8.1%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BSEP 1.50SIXJ 1.67, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BSEP −15.0%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BSEP 0.65SIXJ 0.46

BSEP and SIXJ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BSEPBvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSEPBvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSEPBvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.