Skip to content

BSEP vs XTR

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BSEPBCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.54pt a year

BSEP0.79%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

BSEP 34.2×the volume

BSEP56.1KXTR1.64K

5Y return · a year

BSEP +1.5pt

BSEP+10.4%XTR+8.9%

BSEP vs XTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+64.4%BSEP+53.3%XTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. BSEP +64.4%. XTR +53.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BSEP 0.79%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
BSEP $459M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
BSEP +10.2%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
BSEP 0.00%
XTR 16.45%, better
Holdings
BSEP 503
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
BSEP 56.1K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
BSEP $53.71
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BSEP: Cost 40, Risk 40, Mission 97, Tradability 66, Holdings 90, Durability 76. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for BSEP, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBSEPXTR
Cost30% weightC40A100Higher
Mission25% weightA97Not scored
Risk15% weightC40HigherF18
Tradability15% weightB66HigherF13
Holdings10% weightA90HigherA85
Durability5% weightA76HigherC46

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BSEP and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

BSEP ranks 30th and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 30CBFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 54
  2. Rank 30BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 54
  3. Rank 32CAUGTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BSEPBInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

BSEP Innovator's September-reset buffer fund: it tracks SPY, absorbs the first 9% of a decline, and trades that cushion for a cap reset every fall. Downside padding with a ceiling, on a schedule you can mark on a calendar.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

BSEP The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting investors against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period. It resets approximately annually.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BSEP Absorbs the first 9% of an SPY decline over each roughly one-year outcome period, a cushion written into the fund's documents rather than left to a manager's call.
  • The terms are mechanical and public: SPY as the reference, a 9% buffer, a cap set at each September reset, the period running through the end of August.
  • The 0.79% fee lands right at the median for buffer funds, so the defined-outcome wrapper isn't costing a premium versus the pack.
  • Running since 2019, with years of completed reset cycles behind it across both rising and falling markets.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • BSEP Cheaper buffered exposure exists. Innovator's own laddered BUFB charges 0.10% and spreads money across staggered outcome periods instead of one annual window.
  • Trading is thin next to the category's larger funds, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the usual defense.
  • No distributions: the payoff is built around price movement inside the cap and buffer. Buying mid-period also means a different cap and remaining cushion than a fresh start.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full BSEP profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

BSEP vs XTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BSEP vs XTR Cost

Overpaying BSEP vs XTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BSEP 0.79%

    $15,174

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BSEP 0.79%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BSEP $15,174XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearBSEPXTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BSEP
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

BSEP 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BSEP vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BSEP 0.00%
XTR 16.45%, better
Payout (12M)
BSEP None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
BSEP No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
BSEP No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
BSEP No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
BSEP No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2019 to 2026, same scale for both

BSEP1 paymentAll BSEP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Nov 19, 2019 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD
XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2019 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5202020232026YTD

BSEP vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • BSEP
  • XTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: XTR −20.8% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BSEP 8.1%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BSEP 1.50, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BSEP −15.0%, betterXTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BSEP 0.65XTR 0.94

BSEP and XTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • BSEPBvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSEPBvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSEPBvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.