IBHF ranks 1st and BSJU 11th of 21 funds in the Defined-Maturity High Yield Category.
BSJU vs IBHF
IBHF −0.07pt a year
0.42%0.35%
IBHF 2.7×the volume
81.4K222K
BSJU +1.3pt
+8.0%+6.7%
BSJU vs IBHF Performance
+2.1%+2.0%
- BSJU 0.42%
- IBHF 0.35%, better
- BSJU $330M
- IBHF $613M
- BSJU +2.1%, better
- IBHF +2.0%
- BSJU 6.92%, better
- IBHF 6.05%
- BSJU 217
- IBHF 38
- BSJU 81.4K sh
- IBHF 222K sh, better
- BSJU $24.78
- IBHF $22.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSJU | IBHF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | A78Higher | F22 |
| Durability | B60 | A86Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
Same Category. BSJU and IBHF are both graded against the same 21 Defined-Maturity High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSJUB
IBHFA
In short
BSJU A junk-bond ladder rung with an expiration date: roughly 200 high yield corporate bonds all maturing around 2030, monthly payouts, then the fund winds up in December 2030 and hands back what the portfolio is worth.
Stated mandate
BSJU The fund seeks to track the investment results of the Invesco BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of total assets in corporate bonds in that index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSJU vs IBHF Holdings
How BSJU and IBHF differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country93.3%
Sector
No Sector split for BSJU and IBHF.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BSJUMore in IBHF | BSJU | IBHF |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | IBHF +6.0 points | 89.2% | 95.2% |
| Luxembourg | BSJU +2.4 points | 2.4% | 0.0% |
| Canada | BSJU +1.5 points | 4.0% | 2.5% |
| Japan | BSJU +1.2 points | 1.2% | 0.0% |
| France | BSJU +0.7 points | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | IBHF +0.6 points | 0.9% | 1.5% |
| Other countries (3) | BSJU +1.0 points | 1.7% | 0.7% |
Concentration
- BSJU15.8%
- IBHF89.3%
- BSJU215
- IBHF35
Asset class
- BSJU
- Fixed Income
- IBHF
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. BSJU holds 215 securities, IBHF 35.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSJU vs IBHF Cost
Overpaying BSJU vs IBHF
$1,346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSJU 0.42%
$8,472
IBHF 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSJU | IBHF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $634 | $125 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $2,454 | $473 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $7,126 | $1,346 |
- 0.42%BSJU
- 0.35%IBHF, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
- Median 0.39%
IBHF cheapest of 21 funds
BSJU 13th cheapest of 21 funds
BSJU vs IBHF Dividends
- BSJU 6.92%, better
- IBHF 6.05%
- BSJU $1.72
- IBHF $1.36
- BSJU $0.15
- IBHF $0.08
- BSJU Oct 19, 2026
- IBHF Nov 2, 2026
- BSJU Oct 23, 2026
- IBHF Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BSJU Monthly
- IBHF Monthly
Distribution history
BSJU vs IBHF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSJU 5.1%IBHF 2.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSJU 0.85IBHF 1.16, better
- Worst fall
- BSJU −7.5%IBHF −11.2%
- Market sensitivity
- BSJU 0.75IBHF 0.31
BSJU and IBHF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
