IBHG ranks 3rd and BSJU 11th of 21 funds in the Defined-Maturity High Yield Category.
BSJU vs IBHG
IBHG −0.07pt a year
0.42%0.35%
IBHG 1.6×the volume
81.4K127K
BSJU +1.0pt
+8.0%+7.0%
BSJU vs IBHG Performance
+2.1%+2.8%
- BSJU 0.42%
- IBHG 0.35%, better
- BSJU $330M
- IBHG $532M
- BSJU +2.1%
- IBHG +2.8%, better
- BSJU 6.92%, better
- IBHG 6.38%
- BSJU 217
- IBHG 395
- BSJU 81.4K sh
- IBHG 127K sh, better
- BSJU $24.78
- IBHG $21.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSJU | IBHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F23 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C50 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A78Higher | D30 |
| Durability | B60 | A81Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
Same Category. BSJU and IBHG are both graded against the same 21 Defined-Maturity High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSJUB
IBHGA
In short
BSJU A junk-bond ladder rung with an expiration date: roughly 200 high yield corporate bonds all maturing around 2030, monthly payouts, then the fund winds up in December 2030 and hands back what the portfolio is worth.
IBHG Most target-maturity bond ETFs stick to Treasuries and investment grade. IBHG runs the same ladder-rung playbook in high yield: a basket of dollar-denominated junk and other income bonds all maturing in 2027.
Stated mandate
BSJU The fund seeks to track the investment results of the Invesco BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2030 Index before fees and expenses. It invests at least 80% of total assets in corporate bonds in that index.
IBHG The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated, high-yield and other income-generating corporate bonds maturing in 2027.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSJU vs IBHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSJU vs IBHG Cost
Overpaying BSJU vs IBHG
$1,346
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSJU 0.42%
$8,472
IBHG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSJU | IBHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $634 | $125 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $2,454 | $473 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $7,126 | $1,346 |
- 0.42%BSJU
- 0.35%IBHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity High Yield funds
- Median 0.39%
IBHG cheapest of 21 funds
BSJU 13th cheapest of 21 funds
BSJU vs IBHG Dividends
- BSJU 6.92%, better
- IBHG 6.38%
- BSJU $1.72
- IBHG $1.38
- BSJU $0.15
- IBHG $0.10
- BSJU Oct 19, 2026
- IBHG Nov 2, 2026
- BSJU Oct 23, 2026
- IBHG Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BSJU Monthly
- IBHG Monthly
Distribution history
BSJU vs IBHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSJU 5.1%IBHG 3.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSJU 0.85IBHG 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- BSJU −7.5%IBHG −13.9%
- Market sensitivity
- BSJU 0.75IBHG 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.