IBMQ ranks 2nd and BSMT 7th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMT vs IBMQ
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMQ 1.6×the volume
79.8K129K
IBMQ +0.9pt
−0.1%+0.8%
BSMT vs IBMQ Performance
−0.5%+3.9%
- BSMT 0.18%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- BSMT $309M
- IBMQ $691M
- BSMT +1.4%
- IBMQ +2.2%, better
- BSMT 2.77%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMT 2030
- IBMQ 2957
- BSMT 79.8K sh
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- BSMT $22.70
- IBMQ $25.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMT | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B55 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | B65 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | A77 | A94Higher |
| Durability | A76 | A95Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMT and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMTB
IBMQA
In short
BSMT A 2029 rung of a municipal bond ladder, wrapped in an ETF. It holds roughly 1,900 munis that all mature around the same time, then terminates in December 2029 and pays out: a bond-like ending with fund-like diversification.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
BSMT The fund seeks to track an index measuring US dollar-denominated municipal securities issued by states, state agencies, and local governments. It invests at least 80% of assets in municipal bonds comprising that index.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMT vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMT vs IBMQ Cost
Overpaying BSMT vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMT 0.18%
$3,749
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMT | IBMQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMT
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
BSMT 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMT vs IBMQ Dividends
- BSMT 2.77%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMT $0.63
- IBMQ $0.63
- BSMT $0.06
- IBMQ $0.06
- BSMT Oct 19, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- BSMT Oct 23, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- BSMT Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
BSMT vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSMT
- IBMQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMT 4.7%IBMQ 3.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMT −0.06, betterIBMQ −0.14
- Worst fall
- BSMT −15.6%IBMQ −10.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSMT 0.78IBMQ 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.