IBMR ranks 3rd and BSMT 7th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMT vs IBMR
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMR 1.3×the volume
79.8K105K
IBMR +0.3pt
+4.2%+4.5%
BSMT vs IBMR Performance
+1.4%+1.6%
- BSMT 0.18%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- BSMT $309M
- IBMR $527M
- BSMT +1.4%
- IBMR +1.6%, better
- BSMT 2.77%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMT 2030
- IBMR 2071
- BSMT 79.8K sh
- IBMR 105K sh, better
- BSMT $22.70
- IBMR $25.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMT | IBMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | B55Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | B65 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | A77 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A76 | A85Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMT and IBMR are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMTB
IBMRA
In short
BSMT A 2029 rung of a municipal bond ladder, wrapped in an ETF. It holds roughly 1,900 munis that all mature around the same time, then terminates in December 2029 and pays out: a bond-like ending with fund-like diversification.
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
Stated mandate
BSMT The fund seeks to track an index measuring US dollar-denominated municipal securities issued by states, state agencies, and local governments. It invests at least 80% of assets in municipal bonds comprising that index.
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMT vs IBMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMT vs IBMR Cost
Overpaying BSMT vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMT 0.18%
$3,749
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMT | IBMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMT
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
BSMT 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMT vs IBMR Dividends
- BSMT 2.77%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMT $0.63
- IBMR $0.64
- BSMT $0.06
- IBMR $0.05
- BSMT Oct 19, 2026
- IBMR Oct 1, 2026
- BSMT Oct 23, 2026
- IBMR Oct 6, 2026
- BSMT Monthly
- IBMR Monthly
Distribution history
BSMT vs IBMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMT 4.7%IBMR 4.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMT −0.06IBMR 0.02, better
- Worst fall
- BSMT −15.6%IBMR −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMT 0.78IBMR 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.