IBMQ ranks 2nd and BSMU 14th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMU vs IBMQ
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMQ 1.5×the volume
86K129K
IBMQ +1.4pt
−0.6%+0.8%
BSMU vs IBMQ Performance
−3.1%+3.9%
- BSMU 0.18%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- BSMU $287M
- IBMQ $691M
- BSMU +0.2%
- IBMQ +2.2%, better
- BSMU 2.87%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMU 1829
- IBMQ 2957
- BSMU 86K sh
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- BSMU $21.43
- IBMQ $25.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMU | IBMQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C41 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | A71 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A94Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A95Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMU and IBMQ are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMUC
IBMQA
In short
BSMU A muni fund with an expiration date. BSMU holds municipal bonds maturing in 2030, then winds down around December 15, 2030 and pays out what's left. One rung of a muni ladder, roughly 1,800 bonds deep, in a single ticker.
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
BSMU The Fund seeks to track the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2030 Index by investing at least 80% of assets in its municipal-bond constituents. The portfolio targets U.S. municipal securities with effective maturities in 2030 and is scheduled to terminate around December 15, 2030.
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMU vs IBMQ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMU vs IBMQ Cost
Overpaying BSMU vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMU 0.18%
$3,749
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMU | IBMQ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMU
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
BSMU 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMU vs IBMQ Dividends
- BSMU 2.87%, better
- IBMQ 2.48%
- BSMU $0.61
- IBMQ $0.63
- BSMU $0.05
- IBMQ $0.06
- BSMU Oct 19, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- BSMU Oct 23, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- BSMU Monthly
- IBMQ Monthly
Distribution history
BSMU vs IBMQ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSMU
- IBMQ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMU 5.5%IBMQ 3.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMU −0.03, betterIBMQ −0.14
- Worst fall
- BSMU −18.8%IBMQ −10.8%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BSMU 0.93IBMQ 0.54
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.