IBMR ranks 3rd and BSMU 14th of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
BSMU vs IBMR
IBMR −0.08pt a year
0.18%0.10%
IBMR 1.2×the volume
86K105K
IBMR +0.2pt
+4.3%+4.5%
BSMU vs IBMR Performance
+0.2%+1.6%
- BSMU 0.18%
- IBMR 0.10%, better
- BSMU $287M
- IBMR $527M
- BSMU +0.2%
- IBMR +1.6%, better
- BSMU 2.87%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMU 1829
- IBMR 2071
- BSMU 86K sh
- IBMR 105K sh, better
- BSMU $21.43
- IBMR $25.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSMU | IBMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A87Higher |
| Mission | A96 | |
| Risk | C41 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A71 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A89Higher |
| Durability | A73 | A85Higher |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. BSMU and IBMR are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSMUC
IBMRA
In short
BSMU A muni fund with an expiration date. BSMU holds municipal bonds maturing in 2030, then winds down around December 15, 2030 and pays out what's left. One rung of a muni ladder, roughly 1,800 bonds deep, in a single ticker.
IBMR A muni ladder rung in one ticker: it holds investment-grade municipal bonds maturing in 2029, tracks an AMT-free index, and pays monthly. Bond-style term structure, ETF plumbing.
Stated mandate
BSMU The Fund seeks to track the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2030 Index by investing at least 80% of assets in its municipal-bond constituents. The portfolio targets U.S. municipal securities with effective maturities in 2030 and is scheduled to terminate around December 15, 2030.
IBMR The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade municipal bonds that mature in 2029.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSMU vs IBMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSMU vs IBMR Cost
Overpaying BSMU vs IBMR
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSMU 0.18%
$3,749
IBMR 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSMU | IBMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $183 | $145 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $717 | $564 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $2,106 | $1,643 |
- 0.18%BSMU
- 0.10%IBMR, cheaper
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMR cheapest of 32 funds
BSMU 10th cheapest of 32 funds
BSMU vs IBMR Dividends
- BSMU 2.87%, better
- IBMR 2.54%
- BSMU $0.61
- IBMR $0.64
- BSMU $0.05
- IBMR $0.05
- BSMU Oct 19, 2026
- IBMR Oct 1, 2026
- BSMU Oct 23, 2026
- IBMR Oct 6, 2026
- BSMU Monthly
- IBMR Monthly
Distribution history
BSMU vs IBMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSMU 5.5%IBMR 4.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BSMU −0.03IBMR 0.02, better
- Worst fall
- BSMU −18.8%IBMR −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- BSMU 0.93IBMR 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.