Skip to content

BSTP vs PSFF

Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

BSTPDNYSE Arca

Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

PSFFBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFF −0.23pt a year

BSTP0.89%PSFF0.66%

Avg volume · 30D

PSFF 16.9×the volume

BSTP4.11KPSFF69.4K

3Y return · a year

BSTP +1.5pt

BSTP+15.3%PSFF+13.8%

BSTP vs PSFF Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+8.3%BSTP+9.8%PSFF

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BSTP +8.3%. PSFF +9.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BSTP 0.89%
PSFF 0.66%, better
Fund size
BSTP $59M
PSFF $636M
1Y total return
BSTP +8.3%
PSFF +9.8%, better
Yield (12M)
BSTP No data
PSFF 0.00%
Holdings
BSTP 3
PSFF 13
Avg volume (30D)
BSTP 4.11K sh
PSFF 69.4K sh, better
NAV per share
BSTP $39.96
PSFF $35.05
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BSTP: Cost 9, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 66, Holdings not scored, Durability 62. PSFF: Cost 42, Risk 59, Mission not scored, Tradability 78, Holdings 53, Durability 83.
Pillar letters and Scores for BSTP, PSFF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBSTPPSFF
Cost30% weightF9C42Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD36B59Higher
Tradability15% weightB66A78Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC53
Durability5% weightB62A83Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BSTP and PSFF are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

PSFF ranks 2nd and BSTP 7th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BSWANAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETFScore 60
  2. Rank 2BPSFFPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 3CQBSVAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETFScore 52
  4. Rank 6DDHSBDay Hagan Smart Buffer ETFScore 34
  5. Rank 7DBSTPInnovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETFScore 32

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BSTPDInnovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF

PSFFBPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

In short

BSTP Most buffer ETFs freeze your cap and buffer for a full year. BSTP is the active version: FLEX options on SPY that the manager can reset monthly, so the terms follow the market rather than a calendar.

PSFF Most buffer ETFs hand you one reset date and one cap. PSFF is the fund-of-funds take: an actively steered basket of Pacer Swan SOS buffer funds with staggered one-year periods, for 0.66%.

Stated mandate

BSTP BSTP seeks risk-managed exposure to SPY through FLEX options and may invest directly in SPY or its components. It actively monitors and may reset the options portfolio monthly, seeking participation in SPY returns with an upside limit and protection against a measure of downside loss.

PSFF The Fund seeks capital appreciation with downside protection. It primarily uses Pacer Swan SOS ETFs, while retaining discretion to hold other Pacer ETFs.

Why people hold it

  • BSTP No 12-month lock. The manager monitors the options book and can reset it monthly, seeking SPY participation with a limit on the upside and protection against a measure of downside loss.
  • The step-up design lets the options be re-struck as SPY moves, instead of leaving the fund anchored to a reference level set at the start of a long outcome period.
  • One ticker, no calendar to babysit: the resetting happens inside the fund, which can also hold SPY or its underlying stocks directly alongside the options.
  • Live since 2022, so the strategy has run through real market stress rather than a backtest.
  • PSFF One ticker, many reset dates. It holds Pacer Swan SOS funds whose roughly one-year investment periods begin in January, April, July and October, so you are not pinned to a single start date.paceretfs.com
  • Discretion is the product. The sub-advisor blends Conservative, Moderate and Flex sleeves and may hold other Pacer ETFs, including trend-following ones, rather than locking to one risk setting.paceretfs.com
  • Cost sits near the middle of a small buffer-on-S&P-500 group at 0.66%, with no fee waiver in play. SWAN, the group's other top scorer, runs 0.49%.
  • Live since 2020 and rated in the upper half of its buffer peer group, with trading that is reasonably active for a niche structured-outcome wrapper.

Worth knowing

  • BSTP The 0.89% expense ratio sits at the pricier end of SPY buffer funds. Innovator's dated series on the same reference, such as PMAY, lists 0.79%.
  • Thinly traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the largest buffer names.
  • Flexibility cuts both ways: with terms able to change at each reset, the cap and buffer in force aren't readable off a calendar and need checking against the fund's posted terms.
  • PSFF PSFF states no buffer or cap of its own. Those come from the underlying funds, and when it buys them mid-period it may not capture the full buffer or upside they advertise.paceretfs.comsec.gov
  • A buffer is a cushion, not a floor. Underlying funds absorb a first slice of losses, then take further declines one-for-one with the S&P 500 fund they reference.sec.gov
  • It is a wrapper around other Pacer funds, so their indirect costs ride along with the fund's own. Income is not the design here; payouts have not been part of the story.sec.gov

Full BSTP profile⁠

Full PSFF profile⁠

BSTP vs PSFF Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BSTP vs PSFF Cost

Overpaying BSTP vs PSFF

$3,976

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BSTP 0.89%

    $16,872

  • PSFF 0.66%

    $12,896

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BSTP 0.89%
  • PSFF 0.66%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BSTP $16,872PSFF $12,896

Year by year

YearBSTPPSFFOverpaying
10$1,576$1,180$396
20$5,953$4,504$1,449
30$16,872$12,896$3,976

Expense ratio

  • 0.89%BSTP
  • 0.66%PSFF, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer funds
  • Median 0.64%

PSFF 5th cheapest of 7 funds

BSTP 7th cheapest of 7 funds

BSTP vs PSFF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
BSTP No data
PSFF 0.00%
Payout (12M)
BSTP None
PSFF None

Distribution history

BSTPAll BSTP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFFAll PSFF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BSTP vs PSFF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BSTP 7.8%PSFF 6.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BSTP 1.31PSFF 1.44, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BSTP −16.7%since Mar 2022PSFF −10.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BSTP 0.69PSFF 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • BSTPDvsSWANB

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFFBvsSWANB

    Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF · Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSTPDvsQBSVC

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFFBvsQBSVC

    Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BSTPDvsFBC

    Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFFBvsFBC

    Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.66% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.