SWAN ranks 1st and PSFF 2nd of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer Category.
PSFF vs SWAN
SWAN −0.17pt a year
0.66%0.49%
PSFF 8.4×the volume
69.4K8.3K
PSFF +7.7pt
+9.3%+1.6%
PSFF vs SWAN Performance
+55.7%+8.1%
- PSFF 0.66%
- SWAN 0.49%, better
- PSFF $636M
- SWAN $152M
- PSFF +9.8%, better
- SWAN +1.4%
- PSFF 0.00%
- SWAN 3.41%, better
- PSFF 13
- SWAN 14
- PSFF 69.4K sh, better
- SWAN 8.3K sh
- PSFF $35.05
- SWAN $32.30
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSFF | SWAN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C42 | A78Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B59Higher | F24 |
| Tradability | A78Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C53 | C54Higher |
| Durability | A83Higher | A79 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer funds
Same Category. PSFF and SWAN are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSFFB
SWANB
In short
PSFF Most buffer ETFs hand you one reset date and one cap. PSFF is the fund-of-funds take: an actively steered basket of Pacer Swan SOS buffer funds with staggered one-year periods, for 0.66%.
SWAN The buffer fund that isn't one. Rather than a yearly reset and a capped ceiling, SWAN holds roughly 90% U.S. Treasuries and spends the other 10% on in-the-money S&P 500 call options, aiming for uncapped index exposure with a bond core underneath.
Stated mandate
PSFF The Fund seeks capital appreciation with downside protection. It primarily uses Pacer Swan SOS ETFs, while retaining discretion to hold other Pacer ETFs.
SWAN The fund seeks to track the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index while pursuing uncapped S&P 500 exposure and buffering against significant losses. Its strategy uses approximately 90% U.S. Treasury securities and 10% SPY in-the-money call options.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSFF vs SWAN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSFF vs SWAN Cost
Overpaying PSFF vs SWAN
$3,104
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSFF 0.66%
$12,896
SWAN 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSFF | SWAN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $883 | $297 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $3,394 | $1,110 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $9,792 | $3,104 |
- 0.66%PSFF
- 0.49%SWAN, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer funds
- Median 0.64%
SWAN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
PSFF 5th cheapest of 7 funds
PSFF vs SWAN Dividends
- PSFF 0.00%
- SWAN 3.41%, better
- PSFF None
- SWAN $1.10
- PSFF
- SWAN $0.27
- PSFF
- SWAN Sep 29, 2026
- PSFF
- SWAN Sep 30, 2026
- PSFF
- SWAN Quarterly
Distribution history
PSFF vs SWAN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PSFF
- SWAN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSFF 6.1%, betterSWAN 11.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- PSFF 1.44, betterSWAN 0.91
- Worst fall
- PSFF −10.8%, betterSWAN −31.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PSFF 0.46SWAN 0.86
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.