BSV ranks 1st and SHAG 4th of 12 funds in the Short-Term Core Bond Category.
BSV vs SHAG
BSV −0.09pt a year
0.03%0.12%
BSV 117.8×the volume
2.86M24.2K
BSV +0.1pt
+1.9%+1.8%
BSV vs SHAG Performance
+9.7%+9.1%
- BSV 0.03%, better
- SHAG 0.12%
- BSV $69.6B
- SHAG $75M
- BSV +1.6%, better
- SHAG +1.5%
- BSV 4.08%
- SHAG 4.32%, better
- BSV 3159
- SHAG 1220
- BSV 2.86M sh, better
- SHAG 24.2K sh
- BSV $77.05
- SHAG $46.74
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BSV | SHAG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A80 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | C43 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | B69Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A95Higher | C44 |
Rank among Short-Term Core Bond funds
Same Category. BSV and SHAG are both graded against the same 12 Short-Term Core Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BSVA
SHAGB
In short
BSV The short end of Vanguard's bond lineup: investment-grade US government and corporate paper capped at one to five years, for three basis points a year. Same indexing discipline as its total-market sibling, with far less rate whiplash.
SHAG Short-duration bonds with a twist: SHAG follows an index that reshuffles the short-term investment-grade universe toward its higher-yielding corners, and charges 0.12% a year to do it.
Stated mandate
BSV The fund seeks to track a market-weighted bond index with a short-term dollar-weighted average maturity.
SHAG The fund seeks to follow, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Short Aggregate Enhanced Yield Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BSV vs SHAG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BSV vs SHAG Cost
Overpaying SHAG vs BSV
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BSV 0.03%
$638
SHAG 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BSV | SHAG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $220 | $165 |
| 20 | $216 | $859 | $643 |
| 30 | $638 | $2,520 | $1,882 |
- 0.03%BSV, cheaper
- 0.12%SHAG
- Middle half of Short-Term Core Bond funds
- Median 0.20%
BSV cheapest of 12 funds
SHAG 3rd cheapest of 12 funds
BSV vs SHAG Dividends
- BSV 4.08%
- SHAG 4.32%, better
- BSV $3.15
- SHAG $2.02
- BSV $0.27
- SHAG $0.18
- BSV Oct 1, 2026
- SHAG Oct 27, 2026
- BSV Oct 5, 2026
- SHAG Oct 29, 2026
- BSV Monthly
- SHAG Monthly
Distribution history
BSV vs SHAG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BSV
- SHAG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BSV 2.4%SHAG 2.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- BSV 0.06SHAG 0.14, better
- Worst fall
- BSV −8.0%, betterSHAG −9.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BSV 0.38SHAG 0.36
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.