BTCC ranks 2nd and DFII 6th of 21 funds in the Crypto Option Income Category.
BTCC vs DFII
0.0%by weight
BTCC −0.19pt a year
0.66%0.85%
BTCC 3.0×the volume
23.9K8K
BTCC vs DFII Performance
−27.4%−30.7%
- BTCC 0.66%, better
- DFII 0.85%
- BTCC $15M
- DFII $20M
- BTCC −27.4%, better
- DFII −30.7%
- BTCC 65.93%, better
- DFII 20.66%
- BTCC 4
- DFII 4
- BTCC 23.9K sh, better
- DFII 8K sh
- BTCC $12.40
- DFII $13.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTCC | DFII |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | C44 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | |
| Durability | C51 | A72Higher |
Rank among Crypto Option Income funds
Same Category. BTCC and DFII are both graded against the same 21 Crypto Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTCCB
DFIIC
In short
BTCC Grayscale's income angle on bitcoin: rather than just holding the asset, BTCC sells calls against bitcoin ETPs to convert crypto volatility into cash. Income first, bitcoin participation second, at a fee that undercuts most of its covered-call peers.
DFII A bitcoin income fund that never owns a coin. First Trust's Vest team sells options on bitcoin ETPs to fund a monthly payout targeted 15% above one-month Treasury rates, trading away part of bitcoin's upside for cash flow.
Stated mandate
BTCC The Fund seeks current income and, secondarily, participation in Bitcoin returns through options on Bitcoin exchange-traded products designed to track Bitcoin's price.
DFII The Fund seeks partial participation in bitcoin returns while generating a high level of income. It uses options referencing Bitcoin Exposure Instruments rather than investing directly in bitcoin.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTCC vs DFII Holdings
How BTCC and DFII differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of BTCC and 0.0% of DFII.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BTCC and DFII.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for DFII.
Concentration
- BTCC108.4%
- DFII1912.7%
- BTCC3
- DFII3
Asset class
- BTCC
- Alternatives
- DFII
- Multi-Asset
Holdings
- Only in BTCC3
- In both0
- Only in DFII3
Only in BTCC
3 securities, 100% of BTCC by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 12/24/202693.90%
- Gbtc 03/19/2027 56.54 C13.41%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.09%
Only in DFII
3 securities, 100% of DFII by weight
- 2026-12-31 S&P 500® Mini Index P 3,060.601909.86%
- 2026-12-31 iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF C 71.010.09%
- 2026-12-31 S&P 500® Mini Index C 2,869.31<0.01%
Weight gaps
BTCC and DFII share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTCC vs DFII Cost
Overpaying DFII vs BTCC
$3,303
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTCC 0.66%
$12,896
DFII 0.85%
$16,199
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTCC | DFII | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $1,508 | $328 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $5,706 | $1,202 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $16,199 | $3,303 |
- 0.66%BTCC, cheaper
- 0.85%DFII
- Middle half of Crypto Option Income funds
- Median 0.85%
BTCC 5th cheapest of 21 funds
DFII 10th cheapest of 21 funds
BTCC vs DFII Dividends
- BTCC 65.93%, better
- DFII 20.66%
- BTCC $8.16
- DFII $2.70
- BTCC $0.22
- DFII $0.22
- BTCC Oct 29, 2026
- DFII Oct 1, 2026
- BTCC Oct 30, 2026
- DFII Oct 2, 2026
- BTCC Irregular
- DFII Monthly
Distribution history
BTCC vs DFII Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTCC 29.0%DFII 37.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTCC −0.65DFII −0.33
- Worst fall
- BTCC −44.3%DFII −51.0%
- Market sensitivity
- BTCC 1.01DFII 1.36
BTCC and DFII in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
