RWM ranks 4th and BTCZ 26th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
BTCZ vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 1.6×the volume
18.5M30M
BTCZ vs RWM Performance
+16.6%−10.1%
- BTCZ 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- BTCZ $12M
- RWM $163M
- BTCZ +16.6%, better
- RWM −10.1%
- BTCZ 0.03%
- RWM 3.31%, better
- BTCZ 2
- RWM 3
- BTCZ 18.5M sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- BTCZ $3.44
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTCZ | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D36 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | D30 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. BTCZ and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTCZC
RWMB
In short
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTCZ vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTCZ vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTCZ 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTCZ | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%BTCZ
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
BTCZ 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
BTCZ vs RWM Dividends
- BTCZ 0.03%
- RWM 3.31%, better
- BTCZ $0.001
- RWM $0.48
- BTCZ $0.001
- RWM $0.09
- BTCZ Dec 24, 2025
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- BTCZ
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- BTCZ Annual
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
BTCZ vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTCZ 85.5%RWM 18.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTCZ −0.47RWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- BTCZ −91.1%RWM −43.7%
- Market sensitivity
- BTCZ −1.36RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.