SCHZ ranks 2nd and BTOT 40th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
BTOT vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.07pt a year
0.10%0.03%
SCHZ 2142.6×the volume
1.11K2.37M
BTOT vs SCHZ Performance
−0.7%−0.5%
- BTOT 0.10%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- BTOT $29M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- BTOT
- SCHZ −0.2%
- BTOT
- SCHZ 4.27%
- BTOT 1089
- SCHZ 12610
- BTOT 1.11K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- BTOT $48.24
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BTOT | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A84 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | F8 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | B68 | A78Higher |
| Durability | C41 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. BTOT and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BTOTB
SCHZA
In short
BTOT One ticket for the US dollar bond market, investment grade and high yield together, at 0.10% a year. iShares launched it in December 2025 as a wider take on core bond exposure than the usual index.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
BTOT The Fund seeks broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated fixed-income securities spanning investment-grade and high-yield markets, while tracking its underlying index before fees and expenses.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BTOT vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BTOT vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying BTOT vs SCHZ
$1,468
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BTOT 0.10%
$2,106
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BTOT | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $55 | $128 |
| 20 | $717 | $216 | $501 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $638 | $1,468 |
- 0.10%BTOT
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
BTOT 18th cheapest of 114 funds
BTOT vs SCHZ Dividends
- BTOT
- SCHZ 4.27%
- BTOT
- SCHZ $0.96
- BTOT $0.18
- SCHZ $0.08
- BTOT Oct 1, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- BTOT Oct 6, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- BTOT Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
BTOT vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BTOT SCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BTOT SCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- BTOT SCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BTOT 0.07SCHZ 0.99
BTOT and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
