IVVM ranks 4th and BUFB 13th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFB vs IVVM
IVVM −0.39pt a year
0.89%0.50%
BUFB 1.03×the volume
30.1K29.2K
BUFB +1.6pt
+17.0%+15.4%
BUFB vs IVVM Performance
+11.2%+9.3%
- BUFB 0.89%
- IVVM 0.50%, better
- BUFB $339M
- IVVM $198M
- BUFB +11.2%, better
- IVVM +9.3%
- BUFB
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFB 13
- IVVM 6
- BUFB 30.1K sh, better
- IVVM 29.2K sh
- BUFB $40.06
- IVVM $37.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFB | IVVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | D34Higher |
| Tradability | C48 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | A71Higher | D36 |
| Durability | B65 | B69Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFB and IVVM are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFBC
IVVMB
In short
BUFB Buffer ETFs make you pick a start date. BUFB skips that question: it holds all 12 monthly Innovator 9% buffer ETFs at equal weight, so one sleeve rolls into a fresh outcome period every month.
IVVM Most buffer funds make you pick a start date. IVVM runs overlapping three-month tranches on IVV, each cushioning roughly the first 5% of losses in exchange for a cap, so no single reset date decides everything.
Stated mandate
BUFB The Fund seeks exposure to the investment results of the MerQube US Large Cap Equity Buffer Laddered Index through a laddered portfolio of 12 Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFs. The underlying ETFs seek capped S&P 500 exposure and a 9% loss buffer; BUFB itself does not provide that buffer.
IVVM The fund seeks exposure to large-cap U.S. equities while using staggered-maturity buffers to protect approximately the first 5% of losses. It accepts limited upside and uses the laddered structure to reduce timing risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFB vs IVVM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFB vs IVVM Cost
Overpaying BUFB vs IVVM
$6,893
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFB 0.89%
$16,872
IVVM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFB | IVVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $900 | $676 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $3,460 | $2,493 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $9,979 | $6,893 |
- 0.89%BUFB
- 0.50%IVVM, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
IVVM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFB 9th cheapest of 18 funds
BUFB vs IVVM Dividends
- BUFB
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFB None
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFB
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFB
- IVVM Dec 23, 2025
- BUFB
- IVVM Dec 29, 2025
- BUFB
- IVVM Annual
Distribution history
BUFB vs IVVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFB 7.7%IVVM 6.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFB 1.52IVVM 1.56, better
- Worst fall
- BUFB −14.9%IVVM −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFB 0.68IVVM 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.