PBFR ranks 2nd and IVVM 4th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
IVVM vs PBFR
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.50%0.50%
PBFR 1.7×the volume
29.2K48.7K
IVVM vs PBFR Performance
+9.3%+8.4%
- IVVM 0.50%
- PBFR 0.50%
- IVVM $198M
- PBFR $244M
- IVVM +9.3%, better
- PBFR +8.4%
- IVVM 0.63%, better
- PBFR 0.01%
- IVVM 6
- PBFR 14
- IVVM 29.2K sh
- PBFR 48.7K sh, better
- IVVM $37.59
- PBFR $31.47
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IVVM | PBFR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A85 | A85 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | D36 | A71Higher |
| Durability | B69Higher | C53 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. IVVM and PBFR are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IVVMB
PBFRB
In short
IVVM Most buffer funds make you pick a start date. IVVM runs overlapping three-month tranches on IVV, each cushioning roughly the first 5% of losses in exchange for a cap, so no single reset date decides everything.
PBFR Most buffer ETFs make you pick a start month. PBFR skips that: one ticker holding twelve monthly vintages of PGIM's 20% S&P 500 buffer funds, so caps and buffers are staggered across the calendar.
Stated mandate
IVVM The fund seeks exposure to large-cap U.S. equities while using staggered-maturity buffers to protect approximately the first 5% of losses. It accepts limited upside and uses the laddered structure to reduce timing risk.
PBFR The Fund seeks capital appreciation through U.S. large-cap equity exposure obtained through a laddered portfolio of twelve PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETFs, each intended to limit downside risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IVVM vs PBFR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IVVM vs PBFR Cost
Same expense ratio
$9,979
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IVVM 0.50%
$9,979
PBFR 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IVVM | PBFR |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $900 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,460 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $9,979 |
- 0.50%IVVM
- 0.50%PBFR
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
IVVM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
PBFR 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
IVVM vs PBFR Dividends
- IVVM 0.63%, better
- PBFR 0.01%
- IVVM $0.24
- PBFR $0.0025
- IVVM $0.24
- PBFR $0.0025
- IVVM Dec 23, 2025
- PBFR Dec 30, 2025
- IVVM Dec 29, 2025
- PBFR Jan 2, 2026
- IVVM Annual
- PBFR Irregular
Distribution history
IVVM vs PBFR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IVVM 6.5%PBFR 4.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IVVM 1.56PBFR 1.22
- Worst fall
- IVVM −11.6%PBFR −8.5%
- Market sensitivity
- IVVM 0.52PBFR 0.34
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.