IVVM ranks 4th and BUFD 8th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFD vs IVVM
IVVM −0.45pt a year
0.95%0.50%
BUFD 10.4×the volume
303K29.2K
IVVM +2.2pt
+13.2%+15.4%
BUFD vs IVVM Performance
+9.0%+9.3%
- BUFD 0.95%
- IVVM 0.50%, better
- BUFD $2.22B
- IVVM $198M
- BUFD +9.0%
- IVVM +9.3%, better
- BUFD
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFD 13
- IVVM 6
- BUFD 303K sh, better
- IVVM 29.2K sh
- BUFD $30.34
- IVVM $37.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFD | IVVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61Higher | D34 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A71 |
| Holdings | A71Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A88Higher | B69 |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFD and IVVM are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFDC
IVVMB
In short
BUFD Twelve First Trust deep buffer funds in one ticker, one resetting every month, so you never have to time an outcome period. The trade: a deeper cushion means a lower ceiling, and the ladder wrapper runs 0.95% a year.
IVVM Most buffer funds make you pick a start date. IVVM runs overlapping three-month tranches on IVV, each cushioning roughly the first 5% of losses in exchange for a cap, so no single reset date decides everything.
Stated mandate
BUFD The Fund seeks capital appreciation by providing U.S. large-cap equity exposure while limiting downside risk through a laddered portfolio of twelve FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETFs.
IVVM The fund seeks exposure to large-cap U.S. equities while using staggered-maturity buffers to protect approximately the first 5% of losses. It accepts limited upside and uses the laddered structure to reduce timing risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFD vs IVVM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFD vs IVVM Cost
Overpaying BUFD vs IVVM
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFD 0.95%
$17,869
IVVM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFD | IVVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $900 | $778 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $3,460 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $9,979 | $7,890 |
- 0.95%BUFD
- 0.50%IVVM, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
IVVM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFD 12th cheapest of 18 funds
BUFD vs IVVM Dividends
- BUFD
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFD None
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFD
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFD
- IVVM Dec 23, 2025
- BUFD
- IVVM Dec 29, 2025
- BUFD
- IVVM Annual
Distribution history
BUFD vs IVVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFD 5.8%, betterIVVM 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFD 1.41IVVM 1.56, better
- Worst fall
- BUFD −10.8%IVVM −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFD 0.42IVVM 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.