IVVM ranks 3rd and BUFT 15th of 18 funds in the S&P 500 Laddered Buffer Category.
BUFT vs IVVM
IVVM −0.71pt a year
1.21%0.50%
IVVM 1.2×the volume
23.9K29.3K
IVVM +4.4pt
+10.0%+14.4%
BUFT vs IVVM Performance
+9.0%+10.0%
- BUFT 1.21%
- IVVM 0.50%, better
- BUFT $164M
- IVVM $194M
- BUFT +9.0%
- IVVM +10.0%, better
- BUFT
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFT 8
- IVVM 6
- BUFT 23.9K sh
- IVVM 29.3K sh, better
- BUFT $26.22
- IVVM $36.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BUFT | IVVM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A85Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A78Higher | D38 |
| Tradability | C50 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | C42Higher | D35 |
| Durability | B62 | B69Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
Same Category. BUFT and IVVM are both graded against the same 18 S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BUFTD
IVVMB
In short
BUFT One ticket instead of a whole ladder of dated buffer funds: BUFT owns a basket of S&P 500 buffer ETFs tilted to the defensive end, with capital preservation as its stated goal. That convenience carries a 1.21% price tag.
IVVM Most buffer funds make you pick a start date. IVVM runs overlapping three-month tranches on IVV, each cushioning roughly the first 5% of losses in exchange for a cap, so no single reset date decides everything.
Stated mandate
BUFT The Fund seeks capital preservation by investing in ETFs whose returns are tied to SPY up to a predetermined cap and that provide a defined buffer against SPY losses over a one-year period.
IVVM The fund seeks exposure to large-cap U.S. equities while using staggered-maturity buffers to protect approximately the first 5% of losses. It accepts limited upside and uses the laddered structure to reduce timing risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BUFT vs IVVM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BUFT vs IVVM Cost
Overpaying BUFT vs IVVM
$12,026
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BUFT 1.21%
$22,005
IVVM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BUFT | IVVM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,115 | $900 | $1,215 |
| 20 | $7,873 | $3,460 | $4,413 |
| 30 | $22,005 | $9,979 | $12,026 |
- 1.21%BUFT
- 0.50%IVVM, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Laddered Buffer funds
- Median 0.89%
IVVM 2nd cheapest of 18 funds
BUFT 18th cheapest of 18 funds
BUFT vs IVVM Dividends
- BUFT
- IVVM 0.63%
- BUFT None
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFT
- IVVM $0.24
- BUFT
- IVVM Dec 23, 2025
- BUFT
- IVVM Dec 29, 2025
- BUFT
- IVVM Annual
Distribution history
BUFT vs IVVM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BUFT 3.9%, betterIVVM 6.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BUFT 1.52IVVM 1.56, better
- Worst fall
- BUFT −10.4%IVVM −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BUFT 0.33IVVM 0.51
BUFT and IVVM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.21% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.21% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.21% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
