SPTS ranks 2nd and BWZ 14th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
BWZ vs SPTS
SPTS −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SPTS 21.2×the volume
104K2.2M
SPTS +2.2pt
−0.5%+1.7%
BWZ vs SPTS Performance
−6.1%+10.9%
- BWZ 0.35%
- SPTS 0.03%, better
- BWZ $299M
- SPTS $7.31B
- BWZ +0.1%
- SPTS +2.2%, better
- BWZ 2.34%
- SPTS 4.20%, better
- BWZ 294
- SPTS 97
- BWZ 104K sh
- SPTS 2.2M sh, better
- BWZ $26.66
- SPTS $28.80
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BWZ | SPTS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A94 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D26 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | F21 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A98Higher | A84 |
| Durability | B60 | A74Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. BWZ and SPTS are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BWZC
SPTSA
In short
BWZ The odd one out on the short-Treasury shelf. BWZ skips Uncle Sam and buys 1-3 year government bonds from the rest of the world, spread across a few hundred issues with index caps so no single country runs the show.
SPTS U.S. Treasury notes maturing in one to three years, wrapped at three basis points. SPTS sits in the cheapest tier of the short-Treasury aisle, charging a fifth of the category median for the same plain-vanilla job.
Stated mandate
BWZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Year Global Treasury ex-US Capped Index.
SPTS The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index before fees and expenses, providing exposure to U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities between 1 and 3 years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BWZ vs SPTS Holdings
How BWZ and SPTS differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for BWZ and SPTS.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in BWZMore in SPTS | BWZ | SPTS |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | SPTS +100.0 points | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Japan | BWZ +23.3 points | 23.3% | 0.0% |
| France | BWZ +5.4 points | 5.4% | 0.0% |
| South Korea | BWZ +4.7 points | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| Canada | BWZ +4.7 points | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | BWZ +4.7 points | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| Australia | BWZ +4.6 points | 4.6% | 0.0% |
| China | BWZ +4.6 points | 4.6% | 0.0% |
| Other countries (27) | BWZ +48.1 points | 48.1% | 0.0% |
Outside the US: BWZ 72% developed, 28% emerging.
Concentration
- BWZ11.1%
- SPTS13.9%
- BWZ267
- SPTS93
Asset class
- BWZ
- Fixed Income
- SPTS
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. BWZ holds 267 securities, SPTS 93.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BWZ vs SPTS Cost
Overpaying BWZ vs SPTS
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BWZ 0.35%
$7,126
SPTS 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BWZ | SPTS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%BWZ
- 0.03%SPTS, cheaper
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SPTS cheapest of 15 funds
BWZ 14th cheapest of 15 funds
BWZ vs SPTS Dividends
- BWZ 2.34%
- SPTS 4.20%, better
- BWZ $0.62
- SPTS $1.21
- BWZ $0.05
- SPTS $0.10
- BWZ Nov 2, 2026
- SPTS Nov 2, 2026
- BWZ Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SPTS Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BWZ Monthly
- SPTS Monthly
Distribution history
BWZ vs SPTS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BWZ
- SPTS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BWZ 7.5%SPTS 1.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BWZ −0.09, betterSPTS −0.14
- Worst fall
- BWZ −20.3%SPTS −5.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BWZ 0.94SPTS 0.23
BWZ and SPTS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
