SCHO ranks 1st and BWZ 14th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
BWZ vs SCHO
SCHO −0.32pt a year
0.35%0.03%
SCHO 43.9×the volume
104K4.55M
SCHO +2.3pt
−0.5%+1.8%
BWZ vs SCHO Performance
−6.1%+10.8%
- BWZ 0.35%
- SCHO 0.03%, better
- BWZ $299M
- SCHO $15.7B
- BWZ +0.1%
- SCHO +2.1%, better
- BWZ 2.34%
- SCHO 4.18%, better
- BWZ 294
- SCHO 97
- BWZ 104K sh
- SCHO 4.55M sh, better
- BWZ $26.66
- SCHO $24.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BWZ | SCHO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A94 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D26 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | F21 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | A98Higher | B69 |
| Durability | B60 | A77Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. BWZ and SCHO are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BWZC
SCHOA
In short
BWZ The odd one out on the short-Treasury shelf. BWZ skips Uncle Sam and buys 1-3 year government bonds from the rest of the world, spread across a few hundred issues with index caps so no single country runs the show.
SCHO Short Treasuries, stripped to the studs: roughly 100 US government bonds maturing in one to three years, wrapped in a 0.03% fee. Running since 2010, and one of the tighter builds in its corner of the bond market.
Stated mandate
BWZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Year Global Treasury ex-US Capped Index.
SCHO The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the short-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BWZ vs SCHO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BWZ vs SCHO Cost
Overpaying BWZ vs SCHO
$6,488
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BWZ 0.35%
$7,126
SCHO 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BWZ | SCHO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $55 | $579 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $216 | $2,238 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $638 | $6,488 |
- 0.35%BWZ
- 0.03%SCHO, cheaper
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHO cheapest of 15 funds
BWZ 14th cheapest of 15 funds
BWZ vs SCHO Dividends
- BWZ 2.34%
- SCHO 4.18%, better
- BWZ $0.62
- SCHO $1.00
- BWZ $0.05
- SCHO $0.08
- BWZ Nov 2, 2026
- SCHO Nov 2, 2026
- BWZ Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCHO Pays Nov 6, 2026
- BWZ Monthly
- SCHO Monthly
Distribution history
BWZ vs SCHO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BWZ
- SCHO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BWZ 7.5%SCHO 1.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BWZ −0.09, betterSCHO −0.17
- Worst fall
- BWZ −20.3%SCHO −5.4%, better
- Market sensitivity
- BWZ 0.94SCHO 0.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.