BBSB ranks 4th and BWZ 14th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
BBSB vs BWZ
BBSB −0.31pt a year
0.04%0.35%
BWZ 52.1×the volume
1.99K104K
BBSB +1.1pt
+4.2%+3.1%
BBSB vs BWZ Performance
+2.2%+0.1%
- BBSB 0.04%, better
- BWZ 0.35%
- BBSB $55M
- BWZ $299M
- BBSB +2.2%, better
- BWZ +0.1%
- BBSB 4.12%, better
- BWZ 2.34%
- BBSB 92
- BWZ 294
- BBSB 1.99K sh
- BWZ 104K sh, better
- BBSB $97.77
- BWZ $26.66
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BBSB | BWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A94 |
| Risk | C53Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | D34Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | B66 | A98Higher |
| Durability | D35 | B60Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. BBSB and BWZ are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BBSBA
BWZC
In short
BBSB A plain box of short Treasuries at 0.04%, well under what the category's longtime benchmark fund charges for the very same ICE index. About 90 bonds, monthly income, no story beyond the math.
BWZ The odd one out on the short-Treasury shelf. BWZ skips Uncle Sam and buys 1-3 year government bonds from the rest of the world, spread across a few hundred issues with index caps so no single country runs the show.
Stated mandate
BBSB The fund seeks current income by tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. It uses representative sampling to closely replicate the index's characteristics.
BWZ The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Year Global Treasury ex-US Capped Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BBSB vs BWZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BBSB vs BWZ Cost
Overpaying BWZ vs BBSB
$6,277
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BBSB 0.04%
$849
BWZ 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BBSB | BWZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $634 | $561 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,454 | $2,166 |
| 30 | $849 | $7,126 | $6,277 |
- 0.04%BBSB, cheaper
- 0.35%BWZ
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
BBSB 4th cheapest of 15 funds
BWZ 14th cheapest of 15 funds
BBSB vs BWZ Dividends
- BBSB 4.12%, better
- BWZ 2.34%
- BBSB $4.02
- BWZ $0.62
- BBSB $0.33
- BWZ $0.05
- BBSB Nov 2, 2026
- BWZ Nov 2, 2026
- BBSB Pays Nov 4, 2026
- BWZ Pays Nov 5, 2026
- BBSB Monthly
- BWZ Monthly
Distribution history
BBSB vs BWZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BBSB 1.6%, betterBWZ 7.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- BBSB −0.19BWZ −0.09, better
- Worst fall
- BBSB −1.6%BWZ −20.3%
- Market sensitivity
- BBSB 0.23BWZ 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.