SCHZ ranks 2nd and BYLD 51st of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
BYLD vs SCHZ
SCHZ −0.38pt a year
0.41%0.03%
SCHZ 26.2×the volume
90.3K2.37M
BYLD +1.4pt
+2.6%+1.2%
BYLD vs SCHZ Performance
+9.9%−1.0%
- BYLD 0.41%
- SCHZ 0.03%, better
- BYLD $423M
- SCHZ $10.8B
- BYLD +0.4%, better
- SCHZ −0.2%
- BYLD 5.45%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- BYLD 9991
- SCHZ 12610
- BYLD 90.3K sh
- SCHZ 2.37M sh, better
- BYLD $21.87
- SCHZ $22.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BYLD | SCHZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A95 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B61Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | B58 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | A95Higher | A78 |
| Durability | B69 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. BYLD and SCHZ are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BYLDB
SCHZA
In short
BYLD Most core bond funds buy the whole market and take whatever yield falls out. BYLD tracks an index built from other iShares bond funds, tilted toward the higher-income corners of US fixed income, and pays monthly.
SCHZ Schwab's core bond holding: the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, over 10,000 issues deep, for 0.03% a year. That is the floor of a category whose median fee is more than ten times higher. Running since 2011, pays monthly.
Stated mandate
BYLD The fund seeks to track the Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index, which targets high-yielding U.S. fixed-income securities and provides diversified bond exposure.
SCHZ The fund seeks to track the total return of an index representing the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BYLD vs SCHZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BYLD vs SCHZ Cost
Overpaying BYLD vs SCHZ
$7,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BYLD 0.41%
$8,281
SCHZ 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BYLD | SCHZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $741 | $55 | $686 |
| 20 | $2,860 | $216 | $2,644 |
| 30 | $8,281 | $638 | $7,643 |
- 0.41%BYLD
- 0.03%SCHZ, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SCHZ 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
BYLD 80th cheapest of 114 funds
BYLD vs SCHZ Dividends
- BYLD 5.45%, better
- SCHZ 4.27%
- BYLD $1.19
- SCHZ $0.96
- BYLD $0.09
- SCHZ $0.08
- BYLD Oct 2, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 1, 2026
- BYLD Oct 7, 2026
- SCHZ Oct 7, 2026
- BYLD Monthly
- SCHZ Monthly
Distribution history
BYLD vs SCHZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- BYLD
- SCHZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BYLD 4.9%, betterSCHZ 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- BYLD 0.45, betterSCHZ 0.17
- Worst fall
- BYLD −14.1%, betterSCHZ −17.5%
- Market sensitivity
- BYLD 0.78SCHZ 0.99
BYLD and SCHZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.41% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
