EFAA ranks 2nd and CAGE 9th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
CAGE vs EFAA
EFAA −0.35pt a year
0.74%0.39%
CAGE 1.1×the volume
102K93.6K
CAGE vs EFAA Performance
+3.3%−1.0%
- CAGE 0.74%
- EFAA 0.39%, better
- CAGE $182M
- EFAA $673M
- CAGE
- EFAA +11.8%
- CAGE
- EFAA 8.49%
- CAGE 4
- EFAA 678
- CAGE 102K sh, better
- EFAA 93.6K sh
- CAGE $28.37
- EFAA $54.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAGE | EFAA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63 | A96Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B66Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | A81 | |
| Durability | C52 | A79Higher |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. CAGE and EFAA are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAGEB
EFAAA
In short
CAGE Autocallable payoffs, ETF-wrapped. CAGE holds a laddered book of long-dated autocallable growth options tied to a US large-cap index (MQUSLVA), with no income target and no distributions: the whole case sits in the share price.
EFAA An MSCI EAFE index core with an option-income overlay running on only about half the portfolio, so the rest keeps its upside uncapped. The fee is 0.39% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027, below the typical option-income fund.
Stated mandate
CAGE CAGE seeks long-term capital growth with reduced downside risk through a laddered portfolio of synthetic autocallable growth options linked to the MerQube index. Coupons are reinvested rather than distributed.
EFAA The fund seeks total return through current income and long-term capital growth while providing MSCI EAFE exposure through an active option-income overlay intended to generate income and help mitigate downside risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAGE vs EFAA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAGE vs EFAA Cost
Overpaying CAGE vs EFAA
$6,409
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAGE 0.74%
$14,307
EFAA 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAGE | EFAA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $705 | $614 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $2,725 | $2,290 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $7,898 | $6,409 |
- 0.74%CAGE
- 0.39%EFAA, cheaper
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
EFAA 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
CAGE 9th cheapest of 25 funds
CAGE vs EFAA Dividends
- CAGE
- EFAA 8.49%
- CAGE None
- EFAA $4.62
- CAGE
- EFAA $0.38
- CAGE
- EFAA Oct 19, 2026
- CAGE
- EFAA Oct 23, 2026
- CAGE
- EFAA Monthly
Distribution history
CAGE vs EFAA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAGE EFAA 8.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAGE EFAA 1.02
- Worst fall
- CAGE EFAA −12.0%
- Market sensitivity
- CAGE 1.64EFAA 0.36
CAGE and EFAA in the news

Category Review
Index option income was not one bet this year


Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.44%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.