EFAA ranks 2nd and IDUB 4th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.
EFAA vs IDUB
EFAA −0.05pt a year
0.39%0.44%
EFAA 2.7×the volume
93.6K34.4K
EFAA vs IDUB Performance
+11.8%+16.4%
- EFAA 0.39%, better
- IDUB 0.44%
- EFAA $673M
- IDUB $501M
- EFAA +11.8%
- IDUB +16.4%, better
- EFAA 8.49%, better
- IDUB 4.95%
- EFAA 678
- IDUB 2
- EFAA 93.6K sh, better
- IDUB 34.4K sh
- EFAA $54.22
- IDUB $26.48
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EFAA | IDUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A92 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B58Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | A81Higher | D36 |
| Durability | A79Higher | A75 |
Rank among Index Option Income funds
Same Category. EFAA and IDUB are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EFAAA
IDUBB
In short
EFAA An MSCI EAFE index core with an option-income overlay running on only about half the portfolio, so the rest keeps its upside uncapped. The fee is 0.39% net of a waiver through August 31, 2027, below the typical option-income fund.
IDUB Income-overlay funds usually stop at the U.S. border. IDUB goes the other way: an actively managed developed-plus-emerging-markets stock sleeve with a growth and momentum tilt, built to out-yield MSCI AC World ex USA, for 0.44% a year.
Stated mandate
EFAA The fund seeks total return through current income and long-term capital growth while providing MSCI EAFE exposure through an active option-income overlay intended to generate income and help mitigate downside risk.
IDUB The Fund seeks capital appreciation together with current income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EFAA vs IDUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EFAA vs IDUB Cost
Overpaying IDUB vs EFAA
$954
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EFAA 0.39%
$7,898
IDUB 0.44%
$8,852
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EFAA | IDUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $794 | $89 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,061 | $336 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $8,852 | $954 |
- 0.39%EFAA, cheaper
- 0.44%IDUB
- Middle half of Index Option Income funds
- Median 0.81%
EFAA 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
IDUB 3rd cheapest of 25 funds
EFAA vs IDUB Dividends
- EFAA 8.49%, better
- IDUB 4.95%
- EFAA $4.62
- IDUB $1.31
- EFAA $0.38
- IDUB $0.35
- EFAA Oct 19, 2026
- IDUB Sep 29, 2026
- EFAA Oct 23, 2026
- IDUB Sep 30, 2026
- EFAA Monthly
- IDUB Quarterly
Distribution history
EFAA vs IDUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EFAA 8.4%IDUB 10.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- EFAA 1.02IDUB 1.27
- Worst fall
- EFAA −12.0%IDUB −28.7%
- Market sensitivity
- EFAA 0.36IDUB 0.64
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.34%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.44% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.