Skip to content
etf.net

CANE vs CORN

Teucrium Sugar Fund

CANECNYSE Arca

Teucrium Corn Fund

CORNCNYSE Arca

Overlap

14.0%by weight

Expense ratio

CANE −0.07pt a year

CANE0.54%CORN0.61%

Avg volume · 30D

CORN 1.05×the volume

CANE351KCORN368K

10Y return · a year

CORN +0.8pt

CANE−1.9%CORN−1.1%

CANE vs CORN Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+25.1%CANE−18.9%CORN

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CANE +25.1%. CORN −18.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%40%60%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CANE 0.54%, better
CORN 0.61%
Fund size
CANE $59M
CORN $107M
1Y total return
CANE +25.3%, better
CORN −2.5%
Holdings
CANE 14
CORN 24
Avg volume (30D)
CANE 351K sh
CORN 368K sh, better
NAV per share
CANE $11.66
CORN $17.35
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CANE: Cost 72, Risk 34, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings not scored, Durability 50. CORN: Cost 57, Risk 33, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings not scored, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for CANE, CORN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCANECORN
Cost30% weightA72HigherB57
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD34HigherD33
Tradability15% weightD35C49Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightC50B55Higher

Rank among Agriculture Futures funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CANE and CORN are both graded against the same 6 Agriculture Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Agriculture Futures⁠

Category · 6 funds
See all 6 ›

CANE ranks 2nd and CORN 4th of 6 funds in the Agriculture Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1BPDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CCANETeucrium Sugar FundScore 53
  3. Rank 2CTAGSTeucrium Agricultural FundScore 53
  4. Rank 4CCORNTeucrium Corn FundScore 49
  5. Rank 5CDBAInvesco DB Agriculture FundScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CANECTeucrium Sugar Fund

CORNCTeucrium Corn Fund

In short

CANE Sugar, neat. CANE tracks No. 11 sugar futures through Teucrium's own index, a single-crop position in a peer group mostly built from broad ag baskets, and it has been running since 2011 at 0.54% a year.

CORN The original US corn ETF, running since 2010. Rather than riding the front-month contract, it spreads across three CBOT corn futures (second, third, and the following December) to blunt monthly roll churn.

Stated mandate

CANE The Fund seeks to reflect daily changes in the price of sugar for future delivery through its benchmark, primarily by investing in the benchmark's No. 11 Sugar futures contracts.

CORN The Fund seeks to give investors price exposure to corn for future delivery by tracking the daily movement of its benchmark. It normally invests in corn futures contracts and cash equivalents.

Why people hold it

  • CANE Narrow by design: it aims to reflect daily moves in sugar futures via the Teucrium Sugar Index, primarily No. 11 contracts. No corn or wheat diluting the move.teucrium.com
  • At 0.54% a year, it charges less than the typical fund in its agriculture futures group and less than broad baskets DBA (0.90%) and PDBA (0.75%).
  • Trading since 2011, mid-sized and moderately traded: a seasoned vehicle rather than a thin new launch chasing a theme.
  • CORN The ladder is the whole idea: 35% second-to-expire, 30% third-to-expire, 35% the following December contract, so it is never glued to the front month.sec.gov
  • At 0.61% it undercuts the median fee in its agriculture-futures peer group, and comes in below DBA (0.90%) and PDBA (0.75%).
  • Single-crop exposure with no dilution: corn futures and cash equivalents, nothing else, operating continuously since June 2010.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • CANE One crop, one futures curve. Nothing in the portfolio cushions a rough sugar season, so single-commodity swings land straight in the fund.
  • It is a commodity pool, not a standard fund wrapper, so tax paperwork can look different from a regular ETF. Peer PDBA exists specifically to sidestep K-1s.teucrium.com
  • Not an income holding: it hasn't been paying distributions, and results come from futures price moves alone.
  • CORN One crop, one weather map. Drought, planting surprises and export policy land on the whole fund at once, with no basket of other commodities to cushion the move.
  • You own corn futures, not corn in a silo. The three-contract ladder softens roll costs but does not remove them, so results can drift from spot corn.sec.gov
  • It is structured as a commodity pool rather than a standard stock-ETF wrapper, so the tax and reporting mechanics work differently.teucrium.com

Full CANE profile⁠

Full CORN profile⁠

CANE vs CORN Holdings

How CANE and CORN differ

Overlap by weight

14.0%

Shared holdings make up 35.2% of CANE and 27.9% of CORN.

Level by level

  • Holdings4 in both14.0%
  • Asset classCommodities100%

Sector

No Sector split for CANE and CORN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for CANE and CORN.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CANE91.5%
  • CORN84.9%

Securities held

  • CANE13
  • CORN20

Asset class

CANE
Commodities
CORN
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in CANE9
  • In both4
  • Only in CORN16

Only in CANE

9 securities, 64.8% of CANE by weight

  • SUGAR #11 (WORLD) Mar2817.50%
  • SUGAR #11 (WORLD) May2717.49%
  • SUGAR #11 (WORLD) Jul2715.01%

Only in CORN

16 securities, 22.1% of CORN by weight

  • Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings Canada Inc 11/12/20262.33%
  • Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings Canada Inc 11/25/20262.33%
  • Bell Telephone Co of Canada or Bell Canada/The 12/16/20262.32%

Weight gaps

All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CANE and CORN, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CANEMore in CORN
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037CANE +19.46 points
Goldman Sachs Financial Square Government Fund 12/31/2031FGTXXCORN +10.61 points
Admacm 09/01/2099CORN +3.27 points
Mondelez International Inc 11/03/2026CANE +0.95 points

All 32 CANE holdings⁠All 32 CORN holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CANE vs CORN Cost

Overpaying CORN vs CANE

$1,278

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CANE 0.54%

    $10,720

  • CORN 0.61%

    $11,998

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CANE 0.54%
  • CORN 0.61%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530CORN $11,998CANE $10,720

Year by year

YearCANECORNOverpaying
10$971$1,093$122
20$3,724$4,181$457
30$10,720$11,998$1,278

Expense ratio

  • 0.54%CANE, cheaper
  • 0.61%CORN
  • Middle half of Agriculture Futures funds
  • Median 0.68%

CANE 2nd cheapest of 6 funds

CORN 3rd cheapest of 6 funds

CANE vs CORN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CANE None
CORN None

Distribution history

CANEAll CANE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CORNAll CORN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CANE vs CORN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CANE
  • CORN
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CORN −45.2% · Jun 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CANE 24.2%CORN 15.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CANE −0.41, betterCORN −0.77
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CANE −41.7%, betterCORN −45.2%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CANE 0.37CORN 0.45

CANE and CORN in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • CANECvsPDBAB

    Teucrium Sugar Fund · Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CORNCvsPDBAB

    Teucrium Corn Fund · Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CANECvsTAGSC

    Teucrium Sugar Fund · Teucrium Agricultural Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CORNCvsTAGSC

    Teucrium Corn Fund · Teucrium Agricultural Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CANECvsDBAC

    Teucrium Sugar Fund · Invesco DB Agriculture Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.90%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • CORNCvsDBAC

    Teucrium Corn Fund · Invesco DB Agriculture Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.90%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.