Skip to content

CORN vs TAGS

Teucrium Corn Fund

CORNCNYSE Arca

Teucrium Agricultural Fund

TAGSCNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.2%by weight

Expense ratio

TAGS −0.44pt a year

CORN0.61%TAGS0.17%

Avg volume · 30D

CORN 23.0×the volume

CORN368KTAGS16K

10Y return · a year

TAGS +0.8pt

CORN−1.1%TAGS−0.3%

CORN vs TAGS Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−18.9%CORN−4.9%TAGS

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. CORN −18.9%. TAGS −4.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%20%30%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CORN 0.61%
TAGS 0.17%, better
Fund size
CORN $107M
TAGS $17M
1Y total return
CORN −2.5%
TAGS +10.4%, better
Holdings
CORN 24
TAGS 5
Avg volume (30D)
CORN 368K sh, better
TAGS 16K sh
NAV per share
CORN $17.35
TAGS $25.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CORN: Cost 57, Risk 33, Mission not scored, Tradability 49, Holdings not scored, Durability 55. TAGS: Cost 90, Risk 48, Mission not scored, Tradability 28, Holdings 0, Durability 40.
Pillar letters and Scores for CORN, TAGS, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCORNTAGS
Cost30% weightB57A90Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD33C48Higher
Tradability15% weightC49HigherD28
Holdings10% weightNot scoredF0
Durability5% weightB55HigherC40

Rank among Agriculture Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CORN and TAGS are both graded against the same 6 Agriculture Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Agriculture Futures⁠

Category · 6 funds
See all 6 ›

TAGS ranks 2nd and CORN 4th of 6 funds in the Agriculture Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1BPDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CCANETeucrium Sugar FundScore 53
  3. Rank 2CTAGSTeucrium Agricultural FundScore 53
  4. Rank 4CCORNTeucrium Corn FundScore 49
  5. Rank 5CDBAInvesco DB Agriculture FundScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CORNCTeucrium Corn Fund

TAGSCTeucrium Agricultural Fund

In short

CORN The original US corn ETF, running since 2010. Rather than riding the front-month contract, it spreads across three CBOT corn futures (second, third, and the following December) to blunt monthly roll churn.

TAGS One ticket, four crops: TAGS holds Teucrium's corn, wheat, soybean and sugar funds at roughly a quarter each. Pure farm-field exposure, no energy or metals along for the ride, and the thinnest headline fee in the ag-futures group.

Stated mandate

CORN The Fund seeks to give investors price exposure to corn for future delivery by tracking the daily movement of its benchmark. It normally invests in corn futures contracts and cash equivalents.

TAGS The Fund seeks daily results reflecting the combined performance of four agricultural commodity pools covering corn, wheat, soybeans and sugar. It invests equally in those underlying funds and targets approximately 25% in each.

Why people hold it

  • CORN The ladder is the whole idea: 35% second-to-expire, 30% third-to-expire, 35% the following December contract, so it is never glued to the front month.sec.gov
  • At 0.61% it undercuts the median fee in its agriculture-futures peer group, and comes in below DBA (0.90%) and PDBA (0.75%).
  • Single-crop exposure with no dilution: corn futures and cash equivalents, nothing else, operating continuously since June 2010.sec.gov
  • TAGS Headline fee of 0.17% sits far below the 0.75% typical of ag-futures funds.
  • Targets about 25% each in corn, wheat, soybeans and sugar, so no single crop runs the show.
  • Trading since 2012 and one of the stronger builds in the agricultural futures group.

Worth knowing

  • CORN One crop, one weather map. Drought, planting surprises and export policy land on the whole fund at once, with no basket of other commodities to cushion the move.
  • You own corn futures, not corn in a silo. The three-contract ladder softens roll costs but does not remove them, so results can drift from spot corn.sec.gov
  • It is structured as a commodity pool rather than a standard stock-ETF wrapper, so the tax and reporting mechanics work differently.teucrium.com
  • TAGS It is a fund of funds: you also carry the costs of the four Teucrium funds it holds (sugar 0.54%, corn 0.61%), so all-in cost runs above the headline fee.
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so spreads can widen and large orders can move the price.
  • Built as a commodity pool rather than a standard stock ETF, with no regular distributions; tax paperwork differs, and rival PDBA is designed to skip the K-1.

Full CORN profile⁠

Full TAGS profile⁠

CORN vs TAGS Holdings

How CORN and TAGS differ

Overlap by weight

0.2%

Shared holdings make up 0.2% of CORN and 0.2% of TAGS.

Level by level

  • Holdings1 in both0.2%
  • Asset classCommodities100%

Sector

No Sector split for CORN.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for CORN.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • CORN84.9%
  • TAGS100.1%

Securities held

  • CORN20
  • TAGS5

Asset class

CORN
Commodities
TAGS
Commodities

Holdings

  • Only in CORN19
  • In both1
  • Only in TAGS4

Only in CORN

19 securities, 47.8% of CORN by weight

  • Goldman Sachs Financial Square Government Fund 12/31/203119.10%
  • Admacm 09/01/20995.44%
  • Brookfield Infrastructure Holdings Canada Inc 11/12/20262.33%

Only in TAGS

4 securities, 99.9% of TAGS by weight

  • Teucrium Soybean Fund25.17%
  • Teucrium Corn Fund25.02%
  • Teucrium Wheat Fund24.93%

Weight gaps

All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in CORN and TAGS, widest gap first
HoldingMore in CORNMore in TAGS
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/2037Same weight

All 32 CORN holdings⁠All 32 TAGS holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CORN vs TAGS Cost

Overpaying CORN vs TAGS

$8,452

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CORN 0.61%

    $11,998

  • TAGS 0.17%

    $3,546

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CORN 0.61%
  • TAGS 0.17%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530CORN $11,998TAGS $3,546

Year by year

YearCORNTAGSOverpaying
10$1,093$310$783
20$4,181$1,211$2,970
30$11,998$3,546$8,452

Expense ratio

  • 0.61%CORN
  • 0.17%TAGS, cheaper
  • Middle half of Agriculture Futures funds
  • Median 0.68%

TAGS cheapest of 6 funds

CORN 3rd cheapest of 6 funds

CORN vs TAGS Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
CORN None
TAGS None

Distribution history

CORNAll CORN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TAGSAll TAGS payments⁠

No distribution history available.

CORN vs TAGS Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • CORN
  • TAGS
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CORN −45.2% · Jun 2026. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−40%−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CORN 15.1%TAGS 14.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CORN −0.77TAGS −0.66, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CORN −45.2%TAGS −37.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CORN 0.45TAGS 0.49

CORN and TAGS in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CORNCvsPDBAB

    Teucrium Corn Fund · Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TAGSCvsPDBAB

    Teucrium Agricultural Fund · Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CORNCvsCANEC

    Teucrium Corn Fund · Teucrium Sugar Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TAGSCvsCANEC

    Teucrium Agricultural Fund · Teucrium Sugar Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.54%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CORNCvsDBAC

    Teucrium Corn Fund · Invesco DB Agriculture Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.61% · 0.90%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TAGSCvsDBAC

    Teucrium Agricultural Fund · Invesco DB Agriculture Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.17% · 0.90%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.