Skip to content

CANE vs TILL

Teucrium Sugar Fund

CANECNYSE Arca

Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF

TILLCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

CANE −0.35pt a year

CANE0.54%TILL0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

CANE 6.6×the volume

CANE351KTILL53.2K

3Y return · a year

TILL +4.3pt

CANE−8.0%TILL−3.7%

CANE vs TILL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+25.3%CANE+13.5%TILL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. CANE +25.3%. TILL +13.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%20%30%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
CANE 0.54%, better
TILL 0.89%
Fund size
CANE $59M
TILL $47M
1Y total return
CANE +25.3%, better
TILL +13.5%
Yield (12M)
CANE No data
TILL 4.34%
Holdings
CANE 14
TILL 6
Avg volume (30D)
CANE 351K sh, better
TILL 53.2K sh
NAV per share
CANE $11.66
TILL $19.13
52W range

ETF.net Grade

CANE: Cost 72, Risk 34, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings not scored, Durability 50. TILL: Cost 20, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 47, Holdings 100, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for CANE, TILL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarCANETILL
Cost30% weightA72HigherF20
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD34B55Higher
Tradability15% weightD35C47Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA100
Durability5% weightC50HigherC41

Rank among Agriculture Futures funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. CANE and TILL are both graded against the same 6 Agriculture Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Agriculture Futures⁠

Category · 6 funds
See all 6 ›

CANE ranks 2nd and TILL 5th of 6 funds in the Agriculture Futures Category.

  1. Rank 1BPDBAInvesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 58
  2. Rank 2CCANETeucrium Sugar FundScore 53
  3. Rank 2CTAGSTeucrium Agricultural FundScore 53
  4. Rank 5CDBAInvesco DB Agriculture FundScore 44
  5. Rank 5CTILLTeucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETFScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

CANECTeucrium Sugar Fund

TILLCTeucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF

In short

CANE Sugar, neat. CANE tracks No. 11 sugar futures through Teucrium's own index, a single-crop position in a peer group mostly built from broad ag baskets, and it has been running since 2011 at 0.54% a year.

TILL Teucrium's answer to commodity-fund tax paperwork: an actively managed basket of farm futures from the CBOT and ICE, wrapped as a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099 instead of a Schedule K-1. The name says the quiet part out loud.

Stated mandate

CANE The Fund seeks to reflect daily changes in the price of sugar for future delivery through its benchmark, primarily by investing in the benchmark's No. 11 Sugar futures contracts.

TILL The fund seeks capital appreciation through primarily investing in agricultural commodity futures contracts traded on CBOT or ICE.

Why people hold it

  • CANE Narrow by design: it aims to reflect daily moves in sugar futures via the Teucrium Sugar Index, primarily No. 11 contracts. No corn or wheat diluting the move.teucrium.com
  • At 0.54% a year, it charges less than the typical fund in its agriculture futures group and less than broad baskets DBA (0.90%) and PDBA (0.75%).
  • Trading since 2011, mid-sized and moderately traded: a seasoned vehicle rather than a thin new launch chasing a theme.
  • TILL The "No K-1" in the name is the pitch. It is a 1940 Act fund, so tax season brings a 1099 rather than the partnership schedule commodity pools mail out.
  • Actively managed instead of bolted to a fixed index: a manager works a book of roughly 30 agricultural futures positions traded on the CBOT and ICE.
  • One ticker covers the farm complex, so there is no choosing between single-crop funds like CORN or CANE.

Worth knowing

  • CANE One crop, one futures curve. Nothing in the portfolio cushions a rough sugar season, so single-commodity swings land straight in the fund.
  • It is a commodity pool, not a standard fund wrapper, so tax paperwork can look different from a regular ETF. Peer PDBA exists specifically to sidestep K-1s.teucrium.com
  • Not an income holding: it hasn't been paying distributions, and results come from futures price moves alone.
  • TILL Costs sit at the pricier end: 0.89% a year against a 0.75% median for agricultural commodity funds, and far above Teucrium's own TAGS at 0.17%.
  • A small fund with moderate trading, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads than the category's largest names.
  • The mandate is capital appreciation from futures, not income. Payouts come once or twice a year at most, and results track the futures curve, not spot crop prices.

Full CANE profile⁠

Full TILL profile⁠

CANE vs TILL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

CANE vs TILL Cost

Overpaying TILL vs CANE

$6,152

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • CANE 0.54%

    $10,720

  • TILL 0.89%

    $16,872

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • CANE 0.54%
  • TILL 0.89%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530TILL $16,872CANE $10,720

Year by year

YearCANETILLOverpaying
10$971$1,576$605
20$3,724$5,953$2,229
30$10,720$16,872$6,152

Expense ratio

  • 0.54%CANE, cheaper
  • 0.89%TILL
  • Middle half of Agriculture Futures funds
  • Median 0.68%

CANE 2nd cheapest of 6 funds

TILL 5th cheapest of 6 funds

CANE vs TILL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
CANE No data
TILL 4.34%
Payout (12M)
CANE None
TILL $0.83
Last payment
CANE No data
TILL $0.83
Ex-dividend
CANE No data
TILL Dec 24, 2025
Paid on
CANE No data
TILL Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
CANE No data
TILL Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

CANEAll CANE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

TILLAnnual · 4 paymentsAll TILL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 21, 2022 $0.26; Dec 20, 2023 $11.37; Dec 24, 2024 $0.47; Dec 24, 2025 $0.83. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1020232026YTD

CANE vs TILL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
CANE 24.2%TILL 14.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
CANE −0.41, betterTILL −0.51
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
CANE −41.7%TILL −33.5%since May 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
CANE 0.37TILL 0.50

CANE and TILL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • CANECvsPDBAB

    Teucrium Sugar Fund · Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TILLCvsPDBAB

    Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF · Invesco Agriculture Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.75%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CANECvsTAGSC

    Teucrium Sugar Fund · Teucrium Agricultural Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TILLCvsTAGSC

    Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Agricultural Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CANECvsCORNC

    Teucrium Sugar Fund · Teucrium Corn Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.54% · 0.61%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TILLCvsCORNC

    Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF · Teucrium Corn Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.89% · 0.61%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.