CANE ranks 2nd and TILL 5th of 6 funds in the Agriculture Futures Category.
CANE vs TILL
CANE −0.35pt a year
0.54%0.89%
CANE 6.6×the volume
351K53.2K
TILL +4.3pt
−8.0%−3.7%
CANE vs TILL Performance
+25.3%+13.5%
- CANE 0.54%, better
- TILL 0.89%
- CANE $59M
- TILL $47M
- CANE +25.3%, better
- TILL +13.5%
- CANE
- TILL 4.34%
- CANE 14
- TILL 6
- CANE 351K sh, better
- TILL 53.2K sh
- CANE $11.66
- TILL $19.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CANE | TILL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | F20 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D34 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | D35 | C47Higher |
| Holdings | A100 | |
| Durability | C50Higher | C41 |
Rank among Agriculture Futures funds
Same Category. CANE and TILL are both graded against the same 6 Agriculture Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CANEC
TILLC
In short
CANE Sugar, neat. CANE tracks No. 11 sugar futures through Teucrium's own index, a single-crop position in a peer group mostly built from broad ag baskets, and it has been running since 2011 at 0.54% a year.
TILL Teucrium's answer to commodity-fund tax paperwork: an actively managed basket of farm futures from the CBOT and ICE, wrapped as a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099 instead of a Schedule K-1. The name says the quiet part out loud.
Stated mandate
CANE The Fund seeks to reflect daily changes in the price of sugar for future delivery through its benchmark, primarily by investing in the benchmark's No. 11 Sugar futures contracts.
TILL The fund seeks capital appreciation through primarily investing in agricultural commodity futures contracts traded on CBOT or ICE.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CANE vs TILL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CANE vs TILL Cost
Overpaying TILL vs CANE
$6,152
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CANE 0.54%
$10,720
TILL 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CANE | TILL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $971 | $1,576 | $605 |
| 20 | $3,724 | $5,953 | $2,229 |
| 30 | $10,720 | $16,872 | $6,152 |
- 0.54%CANE, cheaper
- 0.89%TILL
- Middle half of Agriculture Futures funds
- Median 0.68%
CANE 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
TILL 5th cheapest of 6 funds
CANE vs TILL Dividends
- CANE
- TILL 4.34%
- CANE None
- TILL $0.83
- CANE
- TILL $0.83
- CANE
- TILL Dec 24, 2025
- CANE
- TILL Dec 26, 2025
- CANE
- TILL Annual
Distribution history
CANE vs TILL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CANE 24.2%TILL 14.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CANE −0.41, betterTILL −0.51
- Worst fall
- CANE −41.7%TILL −33.5%
- Market sensitivity
- CANE 0.37TILL 0.50
CANE and TILL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.54% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.54% · 0.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


