TAGS ranks 2nd and TILL 5th of 6 funds in the Agriculture Futures Category.
TAGS vs TILL
TAGS −0.72pt a year
0.17%0.89%
TILL 3.3×the volume
16K53.2K
TILL +2.1pt
−5.8%−3.7%
TAGS vs TILL Performance
+10.4%+13.5%
- TAGS 0.17%, better
- TILL 0.89%
- TAGS $17M
- TILL $47M
- TAGS +10.4%
- TILL +13.5%, better
- TAGS
- TILL 4.34%
- TAGS 5
- TILL 6
- TAGS 16K sh
- TILL 53.2K sh, better
- TAGS $25.74
- TILL $19.13
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | TAGS | TILL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A90Higher | F20 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | D28 | C47Higher |
| Holdings | F0 | A100Higher |
| Durability | C40 | C41Higher |
Rank among Agriculture Futures funds
Same Category. TAGS and TILL are both graded against the same 6 Agriculture Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
TAGSC
TILLC
In short
TAGS One ticket, four crops: TAGS holds Teucrium's corn, wheat, soybean and sugar funds at roughly a quarter each. Pure farm-field exposure, no energy or metals along for the ride, and the thinnest headline fee in the ag-futures group.
TILL Teucrium's answer to commodity-fund tax paperwork: an actively managed basket of farm futures from the CBOT and ICE, wrapped as a 1940 Act fund that sends a 1099 instead of a Schedule K-1. The name says the quiet part out loud.
Stated mandate
TAGS The Fund seeks daily results reflecting the combined performance of four agricultural commodity pools covering corn, wheat, soybeans and sugar. It invests equally in those underlying funds and targets approximately 25% in each.
TILL The fund seeks capital appreciation through primarily investing in agricultural commodity futures contracts traded on CBOT or ICE.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
TAGS vs TILL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
TAGS vs TILL Cost
Overpaying TILL vs TAGS
$13,326
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
TAGS 0.17%
$3,546
TILL 0.89%
$16,872
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | TAGS | TILL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $310 | $1,576 | $1,266 |
| 20 | $1,211 | $5,953 | $4,742 |
| 30 | $3,546 | $16,872 | $13,326 |
- 0.17%TAGS, cheaper
- 0.89%TILL
- Middle half of Agriculture Futures funds
- Median 0.68%
TAGS cheapest of 6 funds
TILL 5th cheapest of 6 funds
TAGS vs TILL Dividends
- TAGS
- TILL 4.34%
- TAGS None
- TILL $0.83
- TAGS
- TILL $0.83
- TAGS
- TILL Dec 24, 2025
- TAGS
- TILL Dec 26, 2025
- TAGS
- TILL Annual
Distribution history
TAGS vs TILL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- TAGS 14.2%, betterTILL 14.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- TAGS −0.66TILL −0.51, better
- Worst fall
- TAGS −37.6%TILL −33.5%
- Market sensitivity
- TAGS 0.49TILL 0.50
TAGS and TILL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.17% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.54%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

