ILCV ranks 2nd and CAPE 94th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
CAPE vs ILCV
ILCV −0.61pt a year
0.65%0.04%
CAPE 1.3×the volume
32.5K24.4K
ILCV +9.7pt
+12.9%+22.6%
CAPE vs ILCV Performance
+3.3%+21.0%
- CAPE 0.65%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- CAPE $206M
- ILCV $1.37B
- CAPE +3.3%
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- CAPE 1.58%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- CAPE 173
- ILCV 375
- CAPE 32.5K sh, better
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- CAPE $32.02
- ILCV $109.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAPE | ILCV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F7 | A99Higher |
| Mission | C40 | A82Higher |
| Risk | C46 | A90Higher |
| Tradability | D27 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | D39Higher |
| Durability | F21 | A82Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. CAPE and ILCV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAPED
ILCVA
In short
CAPE Nobel laureate Robert Shiller's CAPE ratio, wired into an ETF: each month it ranks the 11 US sectors on valuation, throws out the one with the worst momentum, and holds the four cheapest survivors in equal weight.
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
Stated mandate
CAPE The fund seeks total returns above the S&P 500 by investing in the four cheapest U.S. large-cap sectors selected through modified CAPE valuation and momentum-based value-trap mitigation.
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAPE vs ILCV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAPE vs ILCV Cost
Overpaying CAPE vs ILCV
$11,868
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAPE 0.65%
$12,717
ILCV 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAPE | ILCV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $73 | $1,090 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $288 | $4,152 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $849 | $11,868 |
- 0.65%CAPE
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
CAPE 91st cheapest of 99 funds
CAPE vs ILCV Dividends
- CAPE 1.58%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- CAPE $0.51
- ILCV $1.65
- CAPE $0.17
- ILCV $0.42
- CAPE Oct 1, 2026
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- CAPE Oct 7, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- CAPE Quarterly
- ILCV Quarterly
Distribution history
CAPE vs ILCV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAPE 13.0%ILCV 10.7%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CAPE 0.66ILCV 1.57, better
- Worst fall
- CAPE −22.1%ILCV −18.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CAPE 0.78ILCV 0.82
CAPE and ILCV in the news
Category Review
US multifactor funds ran 30 points apart

Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.