MUB ranks 2nd and CATF 20th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
CATF vs MUB
MUB −0.20pt a year
0.25%0.05%
MUB 346.1×the volume
26.8K9.29M
CATF vs MUB Performance
+0.8%+0.1%
- CATF 0.25%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- CATF $161M
- MUB $54.4B
- CATF +0.8%, better
- MUB +0.1%
- CATF 3.59%, better
- MUB 3.56%
- CATF 399
- MUB 7950
- CATF 26.8K sh
- MUB 9.29M sh, better
- CATF $48.73
- MUB $103.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CATF | MUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A91 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B68Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | D31 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A82Higher |
| Durability | C43 | A93Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. CATF and MUB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CATFB
MUBA
In short
CATF A California-only muni portfolio that is actively run, not index-tracked: roughly 400 investment-grade bonds picked for income exempt from federal and California income taxes, at 0.25% with no fee waiver involved.
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
Stated mandate
CATF The fund seeks high current income exempt from federal and California income taxes. It primarily invests in investment-grade bonds exempt from those taxes, using top-down credit and duration analysis plus research-driven security selection.
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CATF vs MUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CATF vs MUB Cost
Overpaying CATF vs MUB
$4,099
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CATF 0.25%
$5,159
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CATF | MUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $92 | $363 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $360 | $1,409 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $1,060 | $4,099 |
- 0.25%CATF
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
CATF 17th cheapest of 63 funds
CATF vs MUB Dividends
- CATF 3.59%, better
- MUB 3.56%
- CATF $1.75
- MUB $3.70
- CATF $0.11
- MUB $0.28
- CATF Oct 6, 2026
- MUB Nov 2, 2026
- CATF Oct 8, 2026
- MUB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- CATF Monthly
- MUB Monthly
Distribution history
CATF vs MUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CATF 5.4%MUB 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- CATF −0.38MUB −0.03
- Worst fall
- CATF −6.3%MUB −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- CATF 0.19MUB 0.90
CATF and MUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





