VCRM ranks 2nd and CATF 20th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
CATF vs VCRM
VCRM −0.13pt a year
0.25%0.12%
VCRM 25.3×the volume
26.8K679K
CATF vs VCRM Performance
+0.8%+1.2%
- CATF 0.25%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- CATF $161M
- VCRM $2.2B
- CATF +0.8%
- VCRM +1.2%, better
- CATF 3.59%
- VCRM 4.10%, better
- CATF 399
- VCRM 2595
- CATF 26.8K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- CATF $48.73
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CATF | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A91 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B68 | B68 |
| Tradability | D31 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C43 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. CATF and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CATFB
VCRMA
In short
CATF A California-only muni portfolio that is actively run, not index-tracked: roughly 400 investment-grade bonds picked for income exempt from federal and California income taxes, at 0.25% with no fee waiver involved.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
CATF The fund seeks high current income exempt from federal and California income taxes. It primarily invests in investment-grade bonds exempt from those taxes, using top-down credit and duration analysis plus research-driven security selection.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CATF vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CATF vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying CATF vs VCRM
$2,639
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CATF 0.25%
$5,159
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CATF | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $220 | $235 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $859 | $910 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $2,520 | $2,639 |
- 0.25%CATF
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
CATF 17th cheapest of 63 funds
CATF vs VCRM Dividends
- CATF 3.59%
- VCRM 4.10%, better
- CATF $1.75
- VCRM $3.03
- CATF $0.11
- VCRM $0.21
- CATF Oct 6, 2026
- VCRM Nov 2, 2026
- CATF Oct 8, 2026
- VCRM Pays Nov 4, 2026
- CATF Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
CATF vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CATF 5.4%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- CATF −0.38VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- CATF −6.3%VCRM −6.3%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- CATF 0.19VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.