PAUG ranks 8th and CAUG 33rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
CAUG vs PAUG
0.0%by weight
CAUG −0.49pt a year
0.30%0.79%
PAUG 214.4×the volume
41087.9K
CAUG vs PAUG Performance
−0.4%−0.2%
- CAUG 0.30%, better
- PAUG 0.79%
- CAUG $1M
- PAUG $1.04B
- CAUG
- PAUG +8.9%
- CAUG
- PAUG 0.00%
- CAUG 4
- PAUG 3
- CAUG 410 sh
- PAUG 87.9K sh, better
- CAUG $25.21
- PAUG $46.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAUG | PAUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | D35 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | F14 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F2 | A84Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. CAUG and PAUG are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CAUGC
PAUGC
In short
PAUG A shock absorber with a calendar. PAUG soaks up the first 15% of losses on an S&P 500 ETF over each roughly one-year stretch, trades away some upside via a cap, then resets every August 1.
Stated mandate
PAUG PAUG seeks to track SPY up to a predetermined upside cap while protecting the first 15% of losses over an approximately annual outcome period, resetting at the end of each period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CAUG vs PAUG Holdings
How CAUG and PAUG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of CAUG and 0.0% of PAUG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in CAUGMore in PAUG | CAUG | PAUG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | Same weight | 40.1% | 40.1% |
| Financials | Same weight | 11.3% | 11.3% |
| Communication | Same weight | 9.9% | 9.9% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 8.7% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 4.4% | 4.4% |
| Energy | Same weight | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CAUGMore in PAUG | CAUG | PAUG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CAUG102.8%
- PAUG103.4%
- CAUG3
- PAUG3
Asset class
- CAUG
- Equity
- PAUG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in CAUG3
- In both0
- Only in PAUG3
Only in CAUG
3 securities, 100% of CAUG by weight
- Spy 07/30/2027 151.53 C80.17%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202716.73%
- Spy 07/30/2027 757.67 P4.74%
Only in PAUG
3 securities, 100% of PAUG by weight
- Spy 07/30/2027 7.47 C98.75%
- Spy 07/30/2027 747.03 P4.33%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.30%
Weight gaps
CAUG and PAUG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAUG vs PAUG Cost
Overpaying PAUG vs CAUG
$9,025
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAUG 0.30%
$6,149
PAUG 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAUG | PAUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $1,405 | $860 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $5,331 | $3,218 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $15,174 | $9,025 |
- 0.30%CAUG, cheaper
- 0.79%PAUG
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
CAUG cheapest of 51 funds
PAUG 24th cheapest of 51 funds
CAUG vs PAUG Dividends
- CAUG
- PAUG 0.00%
- CAUG None
- PAUG None
Distribution history
CAUG vs PAUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CAUG PAUG 6.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CAUG PAUG 1.58
- Worst fall
- CAUG PAUG −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- CAUG 0.00PAUG 0.49
CAUG and PAUG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
