CAUG ranks 33rd and PQXV 33rd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
CAUG vs PQXV
0.0%by weight
CAUG −0.20pt a year
0.30%0.50%
PQXV 2.2×the volume
5821.25K
CAUG vs PQXV Performance
−0.5%+0.7%
- CAUG 0.30%, better
- PQXV 0.50%
- CAUG $1M
- PQXV $4M
- CAUG 4
- PQXV 4
- CAUG 582 sh
- PQXV 1.25K sh, better
- CAUG $24.81
- PQXV $25.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CAUG | PQXV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | A70 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D31 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | F9 | F17Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | F2 | F24Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. CAUG and PQXV are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
CAUG vs PQXV Holdings
How CAUG and PQXV differ
0.0%
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Sector98.1%
Sector
| Sector | More in CAUGMore in PQXV | Gap | CAUG | PQXV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | CAUG +1.5 points | 38.2% | 36.7% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | PQXV +0.5 points | 9.2% | 9.7% | |
| Financials | PQXV +0.5 points | 12.0% | 12.5% | |
| Communication | PQXV +0.4 points | 8.4% | 8.8% | |
| Energy | CAUG +0.4 points | 3.9% | 3.5% | |
| Health Care | PQXV +0.2 points | 10.3% | 10.5% | |
| Consumer Staples | PQXV +0.2 points | 4.9% | 5.1% | |
| Real Estate | PQXV +0.1 points | 1.8% | 1.9% | |
| Industrials | Same weight | 7.6% | 7.6% | |
| Utilities | Same weight | 2.1% | 2.1% | |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.6% | 1.6% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in CAUGMore in PQXV | Gap | CAUG | PQXV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% | |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% | |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% | |
| Mexico | PQXV +0.1 points | 0.0% | 0.1% | |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- CAUG103.0%
- PQXV101.1%
- CAUG3
- PQXV3
Asset class
- CAUG
- Stocks
- PQXV
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in CAUG3
- In both0
- Only in PQXV3
Only in CAUG
3 securities, 100% of CAUG by weight
- Spy 07/30/2027 151.53 C78.59%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202717.01%
- Spy 07/30/2027 757.67 P6.16%
Only in PQXV
3 securities, 98.8% of PQXV by weight
- 4SPY Us 12/31/26 C15.2594.47%
- 4SPY Us 12/31/26 P762.634.36%
- Net Current Assets<0.01%
Weight gaps
CAUG and PQXV share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CAUG vs PQXV Cost
Overpaying PQXV vs CAUG
$3,830
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CAUG 0.30%
$6,149
PQXV 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CAUG | PQXV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $900 | $355 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,460 | $1,347 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $9,979 | $3,830 |
- 0.30%CAUG, cheaper
- 0.50%PQXV
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
CAUG cheapest of 51 funds
PQXV 14th cheapest of 51 funds
CAUG vs PQXV Dividends
- CAUG None
- PQXV None
Distribution history
CAUG vs PQXV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- CAUG 0.00PQXV 0.27
CAUG and PQXV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
