CEFZ ranks 4th and CCEF 6th of 7 funds in the Closed-End Fund Portfolios Category.
CCEF vs CEFZ
CEFZ −0.37pt a year
3.19%2.82%
CEFZ 5.4×the volume
3.8K20.6K
CCEF vs CEFZ Performance
+7.0%+5.6%
- CCEF 3.19%
- CEFZ 2.82%, better
- CCEF $35M
- CEFZ $41M
- CCEF +7.0%, better
- CEFZ +5.6%
- CCEF 8.32%
- CEFZ 10.40%, better
- CCEF 59
- CEFZ 45
- CCEF 3.8K sh
- CEFZ 20.6K sh, better
- CCEF $28.50
- CEFZ $7.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CCEF | CEFZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C43 | C54Higher |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | C51 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | D27Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C51 |
| Durability | D31 | C54Higher |
Rank among Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
Same Category. CCEF and CEFZ are both graded against the same 7 Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CCEFC
CEFZC
In short
CCEF Active basket of about 50 US and non-US closed-end funds, picked for income and for the gap between price and net asset value. Pays monthly, and the S-Network CEF index is a yardstick it is measured against, not a list it copies.
CEFZ A 2006 mutual fund that became an ETF in 2025, still running the same play: buy closed-end funds trading below the value of what they hold, and collect the income. All-in cost is 2.82%, with no waiver behind it, and cash goes out monthly.
Stated mandate
CCEF The actively managed fund seeks high current income and long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in unaffiliated U.S. and non-U.S. closed-end funds selected for income and discount-related arbitrage opportunities.
CEFZ The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and income. Its adviser allocates among international and domestic equities, fixed-income securities, and cash, using underlying funds or direct investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CCEF vs CEFZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CCEF vs CEFZ Cost
Overpaying CCEF vs CEFZ
$3,458
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CCEF 3.19%
$45,420
CEFZ 2.82%
$41,962
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CCEF | CEFZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $5,137 | $4,611 | $526 |
| 20 | $17,572 | $16,015 | $1,557 |
| 30 | $45,420 | $41,962 | $3,458 |
- 3.19%CCEF
- 2.82%CEFZ, cheaper
- Middle half of Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
- Median 3.19%
CEFZ 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
CCEF 4th cheapest of 7 funds
CCEF vs CEFZ Dividends
- CCEF 8.32%
- CEFZ 10.40%, better
- CCEF $2.37
- CEFZ $0.81
- CCEF $0.19
- CEFZ $0.07
- CCEF Oct 1, 2026
- CEFZ Oct 29, 2026
- CCEF Oct 8, 2026
- CEFZ Oct 30, 2026
- CCEF Monthly
- CEFZ Monthly
Distribution history
CCEF vs CEFZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CCEF 9.6%CEFZ 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CCEF 0.90CEFZ 0.40
- Worst fall
- CCEF −13.3%CEFZ −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CCEF 0.67CEFZ 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 3.19% · 2.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.82% · 2.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.19% · 2.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.82% · 2.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 3.19% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.82% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.