CEFS ranks 2nd and CEFZ 4th of 7 funds in the Closed-End Fund Portfolios Category.
CEFS vs CEFZ
CEFS −0.21pt a year
2.61%2.82%
CEFS 4.1×the volume
84.1K20.6K
CEFS vs CEFZ Performance
+13.4%+5.6%
- CEFS 2.61%, better
- CEFZ 2.82%
- CEFS $430M
- CEFZ $41M
- CEFS +13.4%, better
- CEFZ +5.6%
- CEFS 7.38%
- CEFZ 10.40%, better
- CEFS 93
- CEFZ 45
- CEFS 84.1K sh, better
- CEFZ 20.6K sh
- CEFS $24.35
- CEFZ $7.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CEFS | CEFZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A77Higher | C54 |
| Mission | A89 | |
| Risk | B62Higher | B57 |
| Tradability | C47Higher | F24 |
| Holdings | D34 | C51Higher |
| Durability | B59Higher | C54 |
Rank among Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
Same Category. CEFS and CEFZ are both graded against the same 7 Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CEFSB
CEFZC
In short
CEFS Saba buys closed-end funds trading below net asset value, then hedges rate risk by shorting Treasuries and bond ETFs. Running since 2017, steered by the firm known for pressing CEF boards to close those discounts.
CEFZ A 2006 mutual fund that became an ETF in 2025, still running the same play: buy closed-end funds trading below the value of what they hold, and collect the income. All-in cost is 2.82%, with no waiver behind it, and cash goes out monthly.
Stated mandate
CEFS The Fund seeks capital appreciation and dividend income.
CEFZ The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and income. Its adviser allocates among international and domestic equities, fixed-income securities, and cash, using underlying funds or direct investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CEFS vs CEFZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CEFS vs CEFZ Cost
Overpaying CEFZ vs CEFS
$2,128
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CEFS 2.61%
$39,834
CEFZ 2.82%
$41,962
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CEFS | CEFZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $4,305 | $4,611 | $306 |
| 20 | $15,082 | $16,015 | $933 |
| 30 | $39,834 | $41,962 | $2,128 |
- 2.61%CEFS, cheaper
- 2.82%CEFZ
- Middle half of Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
- Median 3.19%
CEFS cheapest of 7 funds
CEFZ 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
CEFS vs CEFZ Dividends
- CEFS 7.38%
- CEFZ 10.40%, better
- CEFS $1.77
- CEFZ $0.81
- CEFS $0.25
- CEFZ $0.07
- CEFS Sep 28, 2026
- CEFZ Oct 29, 2026
- CEFS Sep 30, 2026
- CEFZ Oct 30, 2026
- CEFS Monthly
- CEFZ Monthly
Distribution history
CEFS vs CEFZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CEFS 11.5%CEFZ 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- CEFS 1.44CEFZ 0.40
- Worst fall
- CEFS −16.8%CEFZ −6.7%
- Market sensitivity
- CEFS 0.78CEFZ 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 2.61% · 2.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.82% · 2.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.61% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.82% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.61% · 3.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.82% · 3.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.