PCEF ranks 1st and CEFZ 4th of 7 funds in the Closed-End Fund Portfolios Category.
CEFZ vs PCEF
PCEF −0.11pt a year
2.82%2.71%
PCEF 6.0×the volume
20.6K123K
CEFZ vs PCEF Performance
+5.6%+3.2%
- CEFZ 2.82%
- PCEF 2.71%, better
- CEFZ $41M
- PCEF $743M
- CEFZ +5.6%, better
- PCEF +3.2%
- CEFZ 10.40%, better
- PCEF 7.78%
- CEFZ 45
- PCEF 107
- CEFZ 20.6K sh
- PCEF 123K sh, better
- CEFZ $7.91
- PCEF $19.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CEFZ | PCEF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | B65Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B57Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | F24 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A82Higher |
| Durability | C54 | A85Higher |
Rank among Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
Same Category. CEFZ and PCEF are both graded against the same 7 Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CEFZC
PCEFB
In short
CEFZ A 2006 mutual fund that became an ETF in 2025, still running the same play: buy closed-end funds trading below the value of what they hold, and collect the income. All-in cost is 2.82%, with no waiver behind it, and cash goes out monthly.
PCEF One ticker, roughly 110 closed-end funds. PCEF has tracked the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index since 2010, favoring CEFs priced below net asset value and paying out monthly. Cost: 2.71%, net of a waiver through August 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
CEFZ The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and income. Its adviser allocates among international and domestic equities, fixed-income securities, and cash, using underlying funds or direct investments.
PCEF The Fund is based on the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index and normally invests at least 90% of total assets in funds included in that Index. It operates as a fund-of-funds, investing in those funds rather than individual securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CEFZ vs PCEF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CEFZ vs PCEF Cost
Overpaying CEFZ vs PCEF
$1,099
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CEFZ 2.82%
$41,962
PCEF 2.71%
$40,863
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CEFZ | PCEF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $4,611 | $4,451 | $160 |
| 20 | $16,015 | $15,531 | $484 |
| 30 | $41,962 | $40,863 | $1,099 |
- 2.82%CEFZ
- 2.71%PCEF, cheaper
- Middle half of Closed-End Fund Portfolios funds
- Median 3.19%
PCEF 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
CEFZ 3rd cheapest of 7 funds
CEFZ vs PCEF Dividends
- CEFZ 10.40%, better
- PCEF 7.78%
- CEFZ $0.81
- PCEF $1.49
- CEFZ $0.07
- PCEF $0.11
- CEFZ Oct 29, 2026
- PCEF Oct 19, 2026
- CEFZ Oct 30, 2026
- PCEF Oct 23, 2026
- CEFZ Monthly
- PCEF Monthly
Distribution history
CEFZ vs PCEF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CEFZ 9.2%PCEF 10.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- CEFZ 0.40PCEF 0.99
- Worst fall
- CEFZ −6.7%PCEF −24.2%
- Market sensitivity
- CEFZ 0.84PCEF 1.04
Popular comparisons
- 2.82% · 2.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.71% · 2.61%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.82% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.71% · 3.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.82% · 3.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.71% · 3.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.